The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1156 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Emma Harper
I have one more wee question. You said that the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill is separate from the current consultation. Does that mean that the current consultation is based on the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000? Will there be an overlap? Is the bill going to impede the process?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. I am interested in how the bill changes the process for creating and approving deer management plans. What will a deer management plan look like?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Emma Harper
You mention new sections 6ZA and 6ZB of the 1996 act. I am looking at new section 6A of the 1996 act, which talks about
“the relevant owners and occupiers of a particular area of land”
and about
“requiring those owners or occupiers to prepare and submit a deer management plan”.
Can you clarify that? I am thinking about tenant farmers, who have deer management issues, too. Can you clarify whether the deer management plan notices will be given to all landowners and occupiers, or to landowners or occupiers? Who is responsible for creating a plan, if I am a tenant farmer but it is the landowner who receives the notice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Emma Harper
Is the firearms licensing through the deer stalking certificate 1?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Emma Harper
The bill includes provisions about changing national park legislation. What does the Scottish Government want to achieve overall by reforming the national parks legislation, and how will national parks and their management change as a result of the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Emma Harper
Would the proposed legislation impinge on or constrain current economic development? I am thinking about the consultation that has just finished in Dumfries and Galloway, which is a big food-producing region. We focus on food security and the region is important in terms of beef, sheep and dairy produce—48 per cent of Scotland’s dairy herd is in the south-west. Will the bill’s updating of national park legislation constrain economic activity?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Emma Harper
Okay. I am thinking of the reforms around biodiversity enhancement and the challenges with forestry planting across the south-west to meet targets for carbon sequestration. There are impacts on ground-nesting birds, for instance; I have learned so much about curlew, peewits and all these other birds. How will the bill support improvements in biodiversity, for instance, while maintaining sustainable regenerative farming and economic development?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Emma Harper
I am also a member of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and we just did an inquiry into healthcare in remote and rural areas. The big issues that came out of that inquiry included access to housing and recruitment and retention. However, a lot of people were not very happy about the use of the term “remote and rural”, because they felt that it made them seem like the “other” who is seen as being “somewhere over there” rather than being part of everything. That committee even heard from proponents of an agency being created to advocate for people in remote and rural areas, not just in healthcare. I know that the Scottish Government has created a national centre for remote and rural health and care, which was launched in 2022. Do people know that that centre of excellence exists and that it has been created in order to support healthcare?
It has also come to my attention that people do not really talk about the Scottish graduate entry medicine—ScotGEM—programme, which is tailored specifically in order to get rural general practitioners in the Highlands and in the south-west of Scotland. I am interested in hearing a bit of feedback on those healthcare aspects among the people who were interviewed—for instance, whether they were aware of the national centre for remote and rural health and care, or of ScotGEM.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Emma Harper
I have a quick question, Professor O’Hagan. You said that you are coming to the south of Scotland. How will you let people know that you are coming, so that they can engage with the next part of your engagement?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning to youse both. It has been interesting to hear what you have said so far. I am interested in your methodology and how the information was obtained. The committee’s papers say that 146 individuals were interviewed across multiple locations. I think that there were about 20 locations across the Highlands and Islands, which would mean that, on average, about 7.3 folk showed up at each session. I know that it was a mixed methodology, because there was desk-based work and interviews, and there were probably phone calls and so on.
I would be interested to hear about participation in the process. The people who went to the sessions self-selected, and, as MSPs, we know that people come to us and to our caseworkers when there is a problem—they do not come to us when everything is going okay—so I am interested in hearing about the methodology and about how the information was gathered.