I will be really quick, because I am conscious of the time. Jim, you talked about innovation and the different things that can be done to support emissions reduction. For instance, I know about giving Bovaer to dairy cattle to reduce their methane emissions. Will you briefly touch on some other examples of innovation that can help to reduce emissions and support efficiency—if there is anything that you havenae mentioned so far?

Sitting here, listening to talk about co-production, co-design, co-delivery and co-involvement, is really similar to the experience I had when we were looking at the national care service and talking about co-design, lived experience and engaging folk. When I was a nurse educator, I had to get to the nurses on the ground so that they knew what was coming doon the line. Jonnie Hall says that farmers are saying, “Just tell me what you want me to do,” but that is engagement, not co-design. It is complicated and difficult.

I am thinking about how we deliver healthcare change. We talk aboot it being like moving a giant oil tanker to get healthcare embedded in our national health service. I am thinking back to what Pete Ritchie said at the beginning about how education should be the priority on the wedding cake and should be the first thing that we deal with. I am thinking about that—

Yes, but the issue is complicated. It is really challenging to look at how we effect change and get all the voices heard.

Cover crops such as oats can help to improve conditions for ground-nesting birds—black grouse, for instance.

To ask the Scottish Government how the new deal for agriculture and its agricultural support schemes will aim to support the dairy sector. (S6O-04411)

The recent announcement from Arla Foods about a potential £90 million investment for a centre of excellence at Lockerbie could be the beginning of an exciting new chapter for dairy farming in the south of Scotland. The dairy sector is providing produce of peerless quality and is synonymous with my South Scotland region. Can the minister outline how the Government intends to help ensure the future prosperity of this vital industry for years to come?

I will speak to Shirley-Anne Somerville’s amendment, which makes it crystal clear that the Scottish Government takes seriously its responsibilities under the Equality Act 2010. It is absolutely a requirement that we meet those responsibilities, including the specific provisions on separate and single-sex exceptions. This Government, and, in fairness, the previous Labour-Lib Dem Executives, have been absolutely clear in their determination to make sure that women and girls of the future are born into a society that is fairer than the environment in which their mothers and grandmothers lived.

One of the strengths of this Parliament is that we have consistently heard more from the voices of women in this place—from the very top down, since the Parliament’s first days—than we expect to hear in Westminster.

Does that mean that we do not have a wheen of work to do? Of course not, but the commitment to equality and the mainstreaming of feminism in our nation’s work is at the core of the Scottish Government’s approach. I hope that, at decision time, the Parliament will support it, rather than the grandstanding party opposite.

Total spending on equality, inclusion and human rights has increased by 32 per cent over the past two years, including the £42 million that directly supports our equality and human rights infrastructure and the organisations that promote it. That is not enough if we, and society as a whole, treat the status that women continue to occupy in society as a women’s issue, rather than an issue for everyone. Women’s rights are human rights. That is why international standards such as the European Convention on Human Rights under the Council of Europe, which is a body that the Conservative Party seems to object to, are so important. They hold our and every other country to higher standards and, in turn, make progress in protecting and extending the rights of everyone in our society, not least women.

That is also why the Scottish Government is working hard to ensure that the incorporation of four separate international treaties into domestic law works the way that it is intended to. It is disappointing to everyone that the constraints of the Scotland Act 1998 mean that the introduction of the proposed human rights bill, as originally intended, has had to be paused. I know that the cabinet secretary and her colleagues continue to work to find a way forward that embeds the principles of those treaties in our public services and civil society.

Give me a wee second.

I will say a word or two about those members who are standing behind the motion and what their policies when they occupied number 10 said about their attitude to, in their own words, the “safety, dignity, and privacy” of women.

I am coming to that. I know that the legislation is clear that single-sex spaces need to be offered in a “legitimate” and “proportionate” manner, which I will come to in a wee bit more detail.

When those in number 10 were forcing women to declare that they had been victims of rape and sexual assault so that they could access social security benefits for their children, we did not hear much about dignity from members on the Conservative benches then. When they were driving mothers to food banks to feed their weans after slashing universal credit, we didnae hear much about dignity from the members on the Opposition benches then. When they imposed austerity on steroids over 14 miserable years, which had a greater impact on women than men, we did not hear much about dignity from the Conservative and Unionist Party then. The party’s current leader, a former Minister for Equalities, is cosying up to the US President, whose view of women starts and stops with how they can be controlled and how they can gratify him. Yet here we are: with their simple sword of truth and trusty shield of British fair play, they tell us that they are on the side of women in Scotland in order to try to distract people from their record on equality for women and girls in our country. Women who are watching the debate outside the chamber arenae daft: they have been at the sharp end of Tory policy for years and years, over and over, despite an unparalleled track record of electoral failure, failure in Scotland, and failure in the Parliament.

Where and when single-sex spaces are provided legally under the Equality Act 2010 is a complex area of law and precedent. As I said a minute ago, the language that is used is “legitimate” and “proportionate”. As with most public policy, there are no easy answers or actions that will fit into a soundbite, but that is exactly the approach that the Tories have taken with their motion, and it is to be deplored. I support the amendment in the name of the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice.

I know that sportscotland has invested £424,000 for Dumfries and Galloway Council to offer an active schools programme, community sports hubs, community cycling and coaching. We have five of the 7stanes cycle routes in Dumfries and Galloway. Cycling is another sport that can be accessed, and sportscotland has supported those facilities.

I am also interested in the research that is under way to understand the transport and travel barriers that people in island communities and remote places face, and Maureen Campbell mentioned support for that. Can you tell us when the research will be completed, and when will it be published?