Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 3 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2153 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 10 January 2023

Emma Harper

Concerns have been raised that a cold winter, coupled with the Tory-created energy crisis, will mean that large numbers of people will experience hypothermia or other serious issues linked to low body temperature. [Interruption.]

Does the cabinet secretary have concerns that unless the Tory Government takes real action to put money back in people’s pockets, such as by matching the Scottish child payment and properly supporting people on low. incomes every winter, we will only see the number of people who experience hypothermia grow as more of them face the choice between heating and eating?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 22 December 2022

Emma Harper

Last month, the Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee heard from the chief veterinary officer, who said:

“Flu viruses generally like cold and damp conditions, so they survive much better in the winter”.

On biosecurity, which the cabinet secretary mentioned, the CVO pointed to a study that indicated that

“biosecurity improved things by a factor of 44, while housing improved things by a factor of 2.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee, 30 November 2022; c 26, 33.]

That underlines the crucial role of biosecurity.

What can MSPs from all parties do to get out the message that biosecurity is really important and that we must focus on the crucial role that it can play?

Meeting of the Parliament

Point of Order

Meeting date: 22 December 2022

Emma Harper

Earlier this month, the BMA’s GP committee noted that Labour was guilty of demonising GPs who are trying their best to deliver care. What steps is the Scottish Government taking to engage constructively with our health trade unions to ensure that being a GP remains an attractive career choice with a manageable workload?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Emma Harper

We have had some interesting evidence sessions with people who assume that the national care service will do things such as taking away local authorities’ assets. Electric vehicles, for example, were mentioned way back at the beginning of the evidence taking. It might help us if you tell us what the national care service is and is not. The issue of transfer of staff and assets that belong to local authorities, for instance, has been brought up. The point about electric cars was interesting to me because I had asked a question about it. How can we dispel some of the myths that have already been created about the national care service?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Emma Harper

How will the Government ensure that, as part of the co-design process, national accountability allows for local implementation and flexibility? There is a big difference between developing care to be delivered in the city of Glasgow and doing it for rural Dumfries and Galloway, for instance. I assume that co-design will be on-going rather than having an end point for design of the whole service.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Emma Harper

How will we monitor and evaluate the implementation and success—assuming that it is a success—of this framework bill?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Emma Harper

I have a wee quick question. In evidence to the committee, Karen Hedge of Scottish Care expressed concerns that

“care boards ... might just be recreating a system that”—[Official Report, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, 29 November 2022; c 8.]

already exists. We have also heard folk talking about moving the deck chairs around.

I seek clarity that the bill is about establishing a care system that will benefit personally the people on the ground who have been asking for better care and support for themselves.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Emma Harper

I will ask a short question, after which I am happy to move on, but I am sure that I will pick up on stuff later.

People have given us evidence that we should fix the situation now. They have said that we should not pursue the national care service at this point because we need to act to fix the system now. They have asked why we would waste so much money—£1.5 billion—on massive structural reform for a national care service, rather than fixing the current situation. How do you respond to that, minister?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Emma Harper

We have heard people talk about co-design and co-production. They are often used interchangeably, but we know that co-design is actually different from co-production. What is co-design, in terms of shaping the national care service bill?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 December 2022

Emma Harper

I have a couple of questions on the establishment of care boards. There are sections in the bill on

“Establishment and abolition of care boards”,

on

“Directions to care boards”

and on

“Removal of care board members”.

I am interested to hear how we will move forward on developing care boards, who will be on them and whether they will be commissioning or delivery bodies or a bit of both.