The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 825 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful. To take it a stage further, I note that the bill will potentially widen the number of people who are using judicial factors or engaging with judicial factory. If you heard that someone was an accountant, would you expect that they had some form of accountancy qualification? I think that that is the point.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
That is why I wanted to push it a wee bit further.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
It is a strange one. I feel that data protection is always important but, based on the evidence that we heard about people who are not familiar with the legislation and are interacting with it for the first time, the reference seems to be over the top in this case.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
Section 17 of the bill covers the investment power of a judicial factor in respect of the estate. In respect of section 17, does the minister agree with certain stakeholders that it should be stated in the bill that a judicial factor could choose to invest in ethical, social or governance-tested—ESG—investments, even if that might not lead to a maximum income for the estate? Can you explain your reasoning here for the benefit of the committee?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
I am saying that if you heard that someone was an Accountant of Court, you would, if you were not familiar with all the other pieces of legislation, think that they were an accountant—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
Yes, and that they had the training that would go with that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful. I guess that also ties in, to a certain extent, with some of the questions about missing persons and about where non-financial criteria fit in the legislation. There is some overlap in the charity sections, with the potential for people to be judicial factors for trusts. We want to understand this as we approach stage 2. We are modernising very old legislation, and we note from the evidence that we have heard on various areas that there are points when financial return, or holding things static exactly as they are, are not the sole considerations that people would expect to be taken into account. Are we going to change the role of the judicial factor slightly under the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
The Law Society of Scotland, in its response to the committee’s call for views, said that the bill as introduced contains “a significant departure from” the Scottish Law Commission’s draft bill. It stated:
“Specifically, the Law Society considers that there has been a ‘watering down’ of the levels of legal and accountancy knowledge required for the roles of the Accountant and the Depute Accountant.”
On the other hand, the committee heard from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service that the bill reflects the existing approach, and that the existing approach works well. The SCTS believes that, as the same person who is the Accountant of Court also serves as the public guardian, it is important to think about a person’s suitability in the context of both roles, taking into account in particular that the public guardian’s work takes up the majority of the time.
Having heard all the evidence, does the Scottish Government agree with the SCTS, or are you minded to look again at the matter?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
Yes—it is about the balance of skills within the team. I know that that becomes an operational matter, but—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
I hear that, and it is all helpful. I do not want to push you on that—I am conscious that you are an official, rather than the minister—but we have had the question of the level of qualification posed to us. There may not be any practical examples, but the Law Society is currently posing that question to us. It is coming from the Law Society, as a relatively significant stakeholder, rather than from me, so in that sense, it is not unfounded.