The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 825 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
I will leave it there, convener. I appreciate the further detail.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
I was on the committee that considered the bill, and there is no doubt that the situation is extremely challenging and complex. Is there an update on the criteria for determining what is a “fair and meaningful” contribution to the waiver scheme?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
I have a question on a separate point, which I have raised previously. I would like to understand what would happen if a survivor initially signed the waiver and received a payment through the redress scheme but additional substantive evidence then came to light that would have changed the level of award through the scheme or given the individual the chance to go through the civil process. If they signed the waiver, would that be the end of it, or are there provisions that would allow the situation to be looked at again?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
Thank you. Would you be open to sharing the advanced drafts with the committee, to allow us to see where the discussions have got to? As you point out, the contributions are key to confidence in the scheme. It is difficult to find the right word to describe the arrangement, but one of the trade-offs in going down the redress route is that people should have confidence that the contributions are meaningful.
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions the net zero secretary has had with ministerial colleagues regarding reports that wind farm developers are offering payments to local residents in return for signing non-disclosure agreements and not objecting to planning applications. (S6O-00283)
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
There can be no doubt that our young people have been some of the hardest hit by the pandemic. Yesterday, I asked the First Minister what it would take for face masks to be removed from schools, particularly in the classroom, but an answer was not particularly forthcoming. Can the cabinet secretary set out specifically what we expect to see before that measure can be relaxed?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
Does the cabinet secretary agree that that practice is unacceptable, that it distorts the planning system and that it has the potential to turn local communities against the very green energy projects that we will need in the future? Will he commit to carrying out a review of what is happening in practice with many of those large-scale applications?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
I thank the cabinet secretary for advance sight of her statement.
Far from restoring standards in our education system and seeking to reverse the 14 years of damage that the Scottish National Party has done to our once-proud education traditions, the statement has confirmed that the only plan that the SNP has is to double down on radical and ill-thought-out reforms that will end exams as we know them. On top of that, we hear continuation of the very denial that got us into this mess in the first place. The Government is glossing over the identified weaknesses in curriculum for excellence, particularly in relation to knowledge.
Will the cabinet secretary tell parents, pupils and teachers why they should trust the SNP to fix Scotland’s schools when it is this Government that got us into this mess?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
On 8 October, the Scottish Government circulated to stakeholders draft guidance on future plans for the wearing of face coverings in schools. It said:
“Learners in secondary schools will no longer be required to wear face coverings in class, although they will still be required in communal areas.”
However, when the finalised guidance was published just over a week later, that text had disappeared. Can the First Minister help parents, pupils and teachers to understand what led the Scottish Government to overturn the contents of its draft guidance? Does she accept that indefinite use of face masks in classrooms is not proportionate? Will she set out the specific conditions that would be required before the Scottish Government would implement its draft guidance of 8 October?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 7 October 2021
Oliver Mundell
The cabinet secretary is either in denial or is keen to hide her Government’s dire record on education. We need the right data for the right purpose and any cabinet secretary who was serious about restoring standards across our education system would want to end the data desert. Why will the cabinet secretary not get a refreshed Scottish survey of literacy and numeracy, or SSLN, back up and running and rejoin the internationally respected trends in international mathematics and science study and progress in international reading literacy study—TIMSS and PIRLS—assessments?