The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 893 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Oliver Mundell
You have deliberately limited the scope of the bill by using this method. Members will have limited opportunities to amend the legislation when it comes to the detail, because you have put it all to one side for later. That is not proper parliamentary process and it does not allow the Parliament to do its job of holding you to account properly, which creates a real risk and danger for people who will rely on the legislation.
I do not think that we can say that the Parliament or the Government has a very good record when it comes to delivering for many of the people who will be impacted by the legislation. It seems wrong that you are asking us to put so much confidence and trust in a process that means that there will be no scrutiny. Even if people disagree with what you are doing, you will be able to go ahead anyway. The Parliament will not be allowed to do its job. I do not see how you, as a member of the Parliament and a minister in the Government, can think that that will lead to effective co-design or robust legislation. It is just wrong.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I seek your clarification, under rule 2.2 of the standing orders, about the basis on which we continue to sit. The last business motion that we passed was motion S6M-07320, which advised that decision time would be at 6.30 pm today. Clearly, the bureau has met and made a decision to change that, but it is not clear why a business motion has not been brought to the Parliament as a whole.
Some members have already expressed concerns about the change to decision time. Others have expressed concerns about the fact that portfolio question time will not take place. Surely, if a decision has been taken by the bureau, it would be reasonable for such a decision to be put before the whole Parliament, so that we can properly revise the business motion.
20:45Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
Rural schools have already seen whole subjects removed from the timetable. Surely the minister cannot be proud of the fact that, in parts of Scotland, people cannot take whole subject areas. That is not educational opportunities for all. How can it be right that my Dumfriesshire constituents, in the likes of Moffat academy, have fewer opportunities today than I had when I was at school? The minister cannot be proud of that.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Under rule 7.2 of the standing orders, given the circumstances and the seriousness of the bill under consideration, it would be useful for Parliament as a whole—and certainly for me as a member—to understand your expectation of how members will be able to participate in the business. I seek your guidance on how you plan to select speakers on this occasion.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I seek clarification on the role of the Presiding Officer in selecting stage 3 amendments and on the role that the Presiding Officer and Parliament play in ensuring that the amendments that come before us are ECHR compliant.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I seek your guidance. Where members do not move amendments at stage 3, am I right in thinking that it is open to other members to move them to a vote?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
Yes.
Amendment 93 moved—[Oliver Mundell].
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. In the light of the vote that has just taken place on motion S6M-07325, I am keen to understand, under rule 7.2 of the standing orders, how you plan to call members to speak to the amendments that are lodged in the business that we will shortly move to.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
Thank you for that. The power to restate can be used to consolidate REUL or assimilated law into a single instrument. What are the implications of that? What are your views on that? That question is open to all three witnesses.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Oliver Mundell
We have touched on this point already in relation to the appropriateness of the negative procedure, to which I will come back in a second. When it comes to restating REUL or assimilating law, the power to use different “words or concepts” does not go as far as making
“substantive change to the policy effect of legislation.”
Morag Ross mentioned substantive change in one of her answers. What is the threshold for substantive change? Where does that sit?