Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 15 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 825 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 23 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

To ask the Scottish Government what discussions the social justice secretary has had with the health secretary regarding any disproportionate impact on households experiencing poverty, and any other social justice impacts, of the reported lack of NHS dental care provision in some parts of Scotland. (S6O-01923)

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 9 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

The situation is worse than “a fankle”—there is nothing to get tied up or tangled. Will the minister consider a solution that is closer to home? Given that ScotRail is now in public ownership, will she take forward discussions about running a passenger service that actually calls at Lockerbie?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

During stage 1 of the Moveable Transactions (Scotland) Bill, we got a bit of kickback from some witnesses and stakeholders, who said that they were concerned about bits of the bill and had not been asked about it. It is all there in the Official Report and was covered in the stage 1 debate. My question is not specifically about that bill, but will you give an assurance that, when SLC bills are introduced in future, the Government will do its bit to scope out any political risks associated with a bill generating public interest?

11:00  

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

To be fair to Mr Arthur, he has been very helpful and engaged proactively with the committee on that individual example. I just wanted to get assurance that the Government is doing its bit to ensure that stakeholders are squared off on SLC bills. I am getting that assurance from you.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

I am interested in asking, first, about Scottish Law Commission bills. The committee has been scrutinising two of them recently, but there was a suggestion in the 2021 programme for government that the Government wanted to implement a number of other SLC reports in this session. Are you able to enlighten the committee on the pipeline and timescale for the introduction of those bills and how the Government goes about prioritising the different reports?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

I am going to move on to touch briefly on the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill, on which the committee has just reported to the lead committee. I do not want to get into the politics of or a spat on the bill itself. I am more interested in hearing the Government’s thinking on the concept of bringing to the Parliament framework bills that contain a large number of delegated powers. In this specific example, and as a former member of the committee, you can understand the challenge that the committee is faced with when a delegated powers memorandum cannot specifically say how the delegated powers would be used. Do you recognise that challenge?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

Do you, as the Minister for Parliamentary Business, feel that framework bills that rely heavily on secondary legislation give the Parliament as a whole enough opportunity to be part of a co-design process? Why should that process prevent the inclusion of more detail in primary legislation? We did not really get to the bottom of that.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

To push you a wee bit harder, do you have a target for this session to get through the backlog? The bills are usually highly technical. They come to the committee because, although they are not necessarily easy pieces of legislation, they are not politically contentious.

We have picked up a little bit of frustration from the SLC that there are a number of well-thought-out suggestions for how to improve law. We also heard from stakeholders how the Moveable Transactions (Scotland) Bill would make a big difference to how they go about their daily business. It is easy for SLC bills to fall down the Government’s and Parliament’s priority lists, because there are other things that are politically more exciting. I am trying to get a commitment from you that the SLC’s proposals are being considered seriously and that the committee will be kept busy in future.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

I am not asking you to do it today, but are you willing to share with the committee not necessarily specific proposals but, from the reports that are sitting there, a group that you think might be achievable in this session of the Parliament or that you consider to be the top of the priority list?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 7 February 2023

Oliver Mundell

That is a point of consensus, and I share that sentiment, but I have one final question on the technical aspect. Some members of the committee were concerned that there is a lower threshold for parliamentary scrutiny of secondary legislation. Do you accept that there is a danger in a busy Parliament that secondary legislation gets less scrutiny than primary legislation?