The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 825 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Oliver Mundell
The second part of my question was about whether you think that there is sufficient capacity and expertise to handle that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Oliver Mundell
I will ask about the codification of trust law. The Law Society of Scotland and the Scottish Law Agents Society have expressed their support for the bill overall, but expressed regret that it is not a complete codification of trust law. For the committee’s benefit, what did you see as the drawbacks of attempting a full codification?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Oliver Mundell
The Law Society suggests that the starting point, or the principle, should be that trustees should not have any personal liability unless it can be shown that it is fair for them to be liable, so it is suggesting flipping that point around. Without summarising its position unfairly, from my reading it seems that it is suggesting that the principle that personal liability should be introduced is wrong.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 March 2023
Oliver Mundell
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to support the re-opening of railway stations in Dumfriesshire. (S6O-02080)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 March 2023
Oliver Mundell
I thank the minister for that answer but, along with campaigners, I am disappointed that the proposed new stations were not considered strategically important enough to feature in the second strategic transport projects review.
Following the recent cross-party visit that Beattock Station Action Group co-ordinated, will the minister commit the new transport minister—or, failing that, himself—to meet me, Colin Smyth, Emma Harper and representatives of the different campaign groups to better understand how those projects can be taken forward and how we can secure the funding to see those stations re-opened?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Oliver Mundell
I question whether we all think that what the minister suggested would be unfair. My argument in response to what the minister said is that, as business and commercial users of the legislation will get a serious benefit from its passing, should the fees that they pay to access the register not be used to help to protect the most disadvantaged in our society?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Oliver Mundell
If the amendment was tweaked at stage 3 to give an option to delay the review by a further year or two years, would that make it more flexible and more in line with the minister’s thinking?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2023
Oliver Mundell
This piece of legislation has been kicking around for a number of years. It took a long time to get it to Parliament and a long time for the Government and Parliament to give it the priority that people in the legal and business communities felt it deserved. Does it not, therefore, seem unlikely that Parliament will find time to look at any small issues or tweaks that need to be made to the legislation without such a provision being in place?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 15 March 2023
Oliver Mundell
What I can say to the member is that farmers in my constituency are pleased that their LFASS payments have been maintained and restored to previous levels. To those members on the Government benches who pretend that being in the EU is a panacea for farmers, I say that they need to look again at what the EU is doing to find support elsewhere.
Sixteen years of neglect of our rural communities has been followed, in recent years, by a sustained attack on rural life. That has undermined our farmers and rural communities, and it makes many farmers feel that they are not the integral part of Scotland that they are.
Farmers should be the SNP’s first partners when it comes to driving forward change and aspiration for rural Scotland. Sadly, that has not been the case. In their place sit the so-called Scottish Greens, whose answer to protecting the countryside is to ban it. In the Scottish Greens’ utopia, in place of the evils of farming and food production, we would instead see a small but merry band of volunteers tending rank vegetation, and we would have to cross our fingers that reintroducing a few predators would do the rest.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 15 March 2023
Oliver Mundell
I am talking about agriculture policy. If Alasdair Allan does not speak to farmers, I do, and that is what they say. They are frustrated. Those issues affect them. They are concerned that people in this Parliament do not take food security and domestic produce seriously, and are happy to rubbish red meat and blame it for all the environmental ills.