The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 833 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
We have talked a bit about the similarity of this legislation and the law around trusts. Section 17 covers the investment power of a judicial factor in respect of the estate. Following the approach in the Trusts and Succession (Scotland) Act 2024, do witnesses think that the bill should include the provision for a judicial factor to choose to invest in ethical, social or governance-tested investments, even if those might not lead to maximum income for the estate?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
The centre for Scots law at the University of Aberdeen, Professor Grier at Abertay University and R3 have all said that the fiduciary nature of the judicial factor’s duties needs to be spelled out explicitly in the legislation. The commission seems open to that to some extent, if it is stated as a general principle rather than a detailed treatment of the topic. What does the centre for Scots law think of the commission’s view? What do the rest of the panel think of the views expressed so far on this topic?
10:30Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
My next question also relates to section 12, which states that the information-gathering power is subject to existing data protection legislation. That means that, under section 12, a person can refuse to supply information if to do so would be a breach of the data protection legislation. The Law Society has suggested that that provision in the bill might make life more difficult for judicial factors. Do panel members agree? Is it helpful or unhelpful to judicial factors to emphasise that links exist between the bill and the data protection legislation? For the Law Society, is this not simply a restatement of the law as it stands?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
The point being made is pretty clear.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment the ministerial task force on population has made of the potential impact of the centralisation of services on the sustainability of rural communities. (S6O-03309)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
Across Dumfriesshire, my constituents are finding it harder and harder to access basic services. National health service dentistry is now non-existent in many parts of the constituency. My constituents in Sanquhar, Kelloholm and Kirkconnel tell me that they cannot see a general practitioner face to face. Gretna community council says that finding the police in the community and getting them there is now near impossible as they have disappeared. In Langholm, people are working hard to get back basic podiatry and physiotherapy services that were taken away during Covid. Does the minister accept that having such poor services makes it harder for elderly, disabled and disadvantaged people to live in rural communities?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
That was helpful. There are provisions for appointing judicial factors in other legislation. The commission has looked at those, and it is broadly happy with them. Is that correct? Obviously, the bill would have been a chance to change those provisions.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
I think that it would probably be in section 19, but that would be up to drafting colleagues—and probably in section 17—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
Would it be easy to set out in legislation what that meant, or would that be a difficult task?