Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 7 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 825 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

Why would you not be able to consider them in isolation, then? That is the bit that confuses me. If they are entirely specialists and working solely on this, why would you not do that?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

I guess that takes us back to thinking about whether the bill needs to be amended or whether there needs to be additional guidance in relation to missing people.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 30 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

But you think that you have sufficient capacity to ensure that, as these changes come through, you will not require anyone else meeting this level of legal and accountancy qualification.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

The commission believes the proposed reform of the law of judicial factors to be an ideal area for the commission’s law reform project and extremely worth while. I have listened carefully to what the panellists have said about their experience. Do you agree that it is a worthwhile area of reform? From your previous experience, what practical difference will the new legislation make to you when you operate as a judicial factor?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

I want to move on and ask a new series of questions. In response to the committee’s call for views, the Faculty of Advocates said that it would be desirable to give the judicial factor the additional

“power to seek direction from the appointing court.”

When the commission gave evidence to the committee, it seemed to suggest that there were already sufficient powers for the court in section 11. Can the faculty elaborate on what its proposed power would add to section 11? Do any of the rest of the panel want to comment on the desirability of an extra power for the court to give directions?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

I was just going to ask, for clarity, whether you would be keen to have a section 104 order. That is what I am taking from what you have said.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

I take it, from what you have said, that you would be keen to see a section 104 order.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

I am happy with that, convener. Thank you.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

I hear the point. What I meant was whether there is a practical current example where the issue has come up in relation to judicial factors. Have the Faculty of Advocates and other organisations come across examples that have informed your views, or are they based on the law of trusts?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2024

Oliver Mundell

That is fine. I guess the tricky thing is that the person who was involved in driving the bill forward and in its drafting has said that there is not a problem and that the power is already catered for. I am trying to work out whether that power is needed. If there are no specific examples of where it is needed at the moment, it is harder to push back and say that section 11 does not cut it. That is why I was asking.