The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 833 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
Thank you. That is helpful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
We might test the patience of the convener, but I want to ask a further question.
Much of what you have been talking about has been specific to this legislation. Are you promoting and interacting with the role of judicial factor because this is the best legislative opportunity available, or do you feel that doing work on other legislation would be better or beneficial? Do you think that a judicial factor is the right vehicle for missing people, or is it just the best one available?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful. On a slightly different topic, in the earlier session today a question was raised around best financial return versus best interests in missing person cases. In that sort of circumstance, what would your advice be?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
On the back of the comment about credit searches and other bits and pieces, do you think that there is more that the bill could do to put your office in charge of that? We are looking at legislation that has not changed in 100-plus years. Obviously, there is some case law, but we are looking at something that has been neglected when it comes to modernisation.
I just worry about having those sorts of tests, because at some point in the future, we might still be looking at people’s Experian credit ratings rather than at whatever the relevant considerations might be. Does the bill do enough to future proof any checks and, indeed, what the right background might be for the person who occupies this role?
11:30Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
If you found something unsuitable, would you go back to the court with it? What would be the threshold of concern at which you would go back to the appointing court and say, “This individual is not right”?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
And you think that that is okay, as they are performing more of a supportive role.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
In response to the committee’s call for views, the Law Society of Scotland said that the bill as introduced is “a significant departure from” the Scottish Law Commission’s draft bill. Specifically, the Law Society considers that there has been a watering down of the level of legal and accountancy knowledge that is required for the roles of accountant and deputy accountant. Do you agree with the Law Society’s perspective, or do you take a different view? What, in your view, should the bill say in relation to the qualifications that are necessary to hold the posts of accountant and deputy accountant?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
What would be the threshold for going back to court? The bill, as it stands, is not that specific, and you have obviously mentioned doing credit or other background checks. I guess that this is a tricky question, because we are dealing with a hypothetical situation, but what would the level be? Speaking as a layperson, I know that not everybody has a squeaky-clean credit rating; people will have had all sorts of things going on in their lives. Where do you draw the line?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
Going back to the second part of my question, what specifically do you think the bill should say in relation to the qualifications that are necessary? Are you happy with what is in the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
I totally hear what you are saying and I understand your point, but I guess that the question would be: who else makes that decision in that circumstance if it is not the judicial factor? How do you resolve those tensions if the person is not there?