The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 825 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
It is a brief supplementary, convener.
Minister, you say that you are willing to work with people on the issue. I will gently push you on that. On some of these issues, it is for the Government to show leadership and not to leave the matter to committees or to individuals to push it forward.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
There is a distinction. On some issues, you would expect to take soundings but, on others, the public would expect the Government to take a lead.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
Thank you, convener, and good morning, minister. The committee has heard from a range of stakeholders on the extension of candidacy rights to individuals with limited leave to remain. Although there is support in large part for the principle, there are concerns about the practical implications, and it has been suggested to the committee that individuals could qualify for candidacy only when their limited leave to remain would allow them to serve a full term. Would you consider that suggestion?
09:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
I understand that, but, if you dig into it, you see that such a situation could be controversial. If someone elected by the public had to leave the country part of the way through their term, that would lead to difficulties. Do you accept that the potential for such awkwardness exists, however unlikely it is to happen in practice?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
The current process is far from fair or equitable, with local communities and residents facing aggressive and humiliating questioning from legal representatives who are desperate to deliver consent for their clients. Worse still, useful video evidence from past inquiries that shows such behaviour has been removed, which prevents scrutiny and denies new objectors the chance to familiarise themselves with the likely process.
Does the minister agree that local communities deserve legal representation when the process is clearly combative? Will she ask the DPEA—the planning and environmental appeals division—to look again at the decision to remove videos from its website?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Oliver Mundell
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions the Minister for Energy, Just Transition and Fair Work has had with ministerial colleagues regarding any support that it provides to communities opposing onshore wind farm developments at public inquiries. (S6O-03359)
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
In practical terms, what should a family be able to produce? What should the evidential threshold be and what would that look like in practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
That is helpful and there are certainly things that we can reflect on there.
In section 3, there are two co-existing sets of circumstances in which a judicial factor can be appointed. The first one is when it is
“not possible, practicable or sensible”
for the person who would otherwise do it to carry out the role, which you mentioned, and the second is when
“it would be to the advantage of the estate”
for a judicial factor to be appointed. In the case of a missing person, should the second condition take precedence? In a sense, that may be easier to demonstrate. When someone’s presence is not known, it might be easier to prove that it would be to the advantage of the estate to have someone managing it.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
The committee has been considering the judicial factor’s investment power under section 17 of the bill. For the benefit of the committee, if a judicial factor asked you, in your role as the Accountant of Court, whether they were permitted to choose environmental, social and governance investments, but nothing was otherwise stated in legislation about that, what would your advice to them be?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Oliver Mundell
Do you think that that needs to be looked at again by the Government?
10:15