The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2072 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
How many public sector jobs is the Government likely to cut in the next three years to meet the reform objectives? Is there a target?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
How many people work in the Scottish civil service?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Do you plan to make cuts yourself?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Forgive me, but my question is about why people are paying more tax when the Government does not have more money to spend. The answer to the question is not a technocratic one about the fiscal framework. It sounds to me as if you are pinning all your hopes on a review to fix the problem. Page 4 of the report makes it clear what the problem is. It states:
“The relative performance of the tax base, such as growth in wages and employment, in Scotland compared to the rest of the UK is a main driver of these differences.”
That is what I am looking for an answer on. How will we fix that problem, not the fiscal framework?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
They must have told somebody in the Government why they were pulling out. They would not just walk away from the deal with no reason or explanation—I just find that hard to believe.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Let us ask the board. Sir Mark, why did the board not approve proceeding with the Scottish Government’s recommendation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
I appreciate that you were not there, and people’s roles change, but are there any minutes of board meetings at which the matter was discussed, so that we know how the decision was reached? The Scottish Government does not even know, so how on earth will we ever know?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Yes. There is a difference between someone being off sick for a few weeks and being off for six months.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Do you think that you ruffled some feathers when you undertook the work that you did to unearth those governance issues when you joined the organisation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Okay. There is nothing that you have said that we did not already know, nor that gives us or the yard any hope that the Government will give it any contracts, either directly or via regular procurement.
The last business plan that the yard came up with was quite a good one, but it was predicated on the award of the small vessel replacement programme, which of course it was not given, so that business plan was ripped up and the yard has had to start again. It is hard to see what the future is for the yard. I have got no idea what the Government’s strategy is. The yard is, of course, a strategic commercial asset of the Scottish Government. Is the plan to keep it in the public sector forever, publicly owned, and subsidise it, and then come up with all these issues around direct awards because it is a publicly owned company? Is there any plan to put it back into the private sector and then let it bid for work? We have got absolutely no idea.