The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2072 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
They are hot off the press, I should add.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
During the most recent session that we had with the Auditor General, we talked about dealing with this long-term stubborn issue, which Mr Beattie picked up on earlier. In the week or so since that session, I have tried to do some analysis of Audit Scotland’s previous reports. The 2005 report was called “Moving on? An overview of delayed discharges in Scotland” and there was a report in 2016 called “Changing models of health and social care”.
There have been repeated Audit Scotland reports over the years. One of things that has never really been clear from all those reports is what lessons were learned. I feel like I have a bit of déjà vu. If I could go back to the audit committee of 10 years ago, I would probably find that it was having the same conversation and getting similar answers from the director general for health at the time. I feel as though we are going round in circles. There is a lot of jargon and rhetoric, but the statistics prove that virtually no progress has been made since those reports came out. My biggest fear is that, during the next parliamentary session, we will be having exactly the same conversation in two, three, four or five years’ time. Fill me with some confidence that the next public audit committee and whoever sits on it will not need to have this conversation again.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
That is helpful.
On the issue of adults with incapacity, are those people who are medically fit to leave hospital, but do not have the capacity to look after themselves once discharged? If they were sent home, they would not be able to look after themselves, therefore they are safer in hospital.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
That is one area in which there could be improvement.
We have talked a bit about data. Mr Simpson talked about the £440 million mentioned in the report. That was just one year. I presume that that was a primitive calculation based on the number of bed days and the cost per day per bed, which I think is around £618. It is a very simple way of looking at it. There must be a better way of measuring the cost. Do you have a number?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
I am not suggesting that you do not staff those beds. My point is that the beds are being occupied by people who do not need to be in them.
Is there any analysis of how many clinical or non-clinical hours are taken up with looking after those patients? After all, once someone has gone out the hospital door, they are someone else’s problem—the duty of care lies with someone else—and that member of clinical staff will be automatically and immediately freed up to look after someone else either in that bed or otherwise. Has that piece of work, or analysis, ever been done?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
You are director general for health and social care, so I appreciate that you are not in charge of local government or its budget. However, I presume that you have some influence over the working of integration joint boards, the role that they play in delivering social care and how that links into the wider health and social care budget, which is essentially a unified budget. What would you like to happen? I appreciate that it is difficult to give an analysis when you are the person in charge, but you must know why people are stuck in hospital. You must know the main reasons why you cannot get people out of hospital beds and into another setting. There must be analysis of the main reasons for that. You will know what the sticking points are. What are they, and how will you go about fixing them?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Forgive me, but that sounds a bit like you are saying that it is not getting any worse but it is not getting any better, so that is fine. I am not talking about a blip. The report is not about one year out of the ordinary but a pattern that has been repeated over the decades since a promise was made to eradicate delayed discharge. I question whether it is possible to eradicate delayed discharge at all. It has been sitting at around 3 per cent of all discharges and consistently affecting around 18,000 people, year on year, for the past 10 years. Is that just the base level that we have to accept now?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Statistical data would be helpful. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Do you know whether the 100 additional staff are just temporary contractors who have been brought in to deal with the issue, or has the agency’s base level of full-time-equivalent staff rocketed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Greene
Like other members, I would be concerned that somebody at a later stage in life who has retired with health issues, for instance, might have to wait two years to get a back payment in their bank account when they could be benefiting from it now. I know that some cases are complex and lengthy, but do you think that the process should be sped up? Should there be a target for getting through the backlog more quickly, so that people—presumably pensioners, for the most part—will get their money?