The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1875 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Could you explain what you mean by the following comment, which appears in bold on page 16 of your report:
“The Medium-Term Financial Strategy highlights the unsustainable financial position of the Scottish public sector”?
That is a bold and sweeping statement. What do you mean by that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
That is interesting. In other words, the way out of that hole is to spend less or raise more money. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I find any assertion that any of this is value for money beyond the pale. Clearly, £335 million for a £90 million contract is not value for money. My issue really is: what faith can any of us have—as a Public Audit Committee or as a Parliament, or you as Audit Scotland—that any projections, either timelines or financial projections for the cost completion of the project, are going to be accurate? They have never been accurate. The accountable officer has never had accurate information from day 1. There has been slippage on the dates and the costs, which started at £110 million six years ago, and became £200 million, £220 million, £300 million, then £335 million. My question is, where does it end? What faith can we have that any estimates coming out of the business are accurate and reliable?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I apologise but I think that we are short of time.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
That is interesting. I go back to the point about how the Government does that. It has to make ends meet, so it cannot spend more than it has, with the exception of some capital borrowing opportunities. You also said that there is some Scotland reserve money that could be rolled over, so there is some wriggle room in being able to dip into pots of money where the Government does not have it for the balance sheet.
Going back to the point about how the Government could best resolve the situation, public sector reform is clearly one area. Making cuts is never popular for any Government. On the other important bit about raising money, is that best achieved through simple tax raising? Are there other means of growing the economy, such as increasing the tax base or improving income from other taxation due to growth in the business sector, for example?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
That sounds eminently sensible, Auditor General.
Another area that I wanted to touch on, which is not in the report but is very much linked to what you have just said, is our net fiscal deficit. For the year that we are looking at in the consolidated accounts, the deficit widened to 11.7 per cent of GDP, which is more than twice the UK average of 5.1 per cent. That strikes me as a concern.
Also, public expenditure relative to GDP is 55 per cent in Scotland, while the UK average has been about 44 per cent. Those metrics seem to show that we are on slightly different tangents. I do not know whether that is good, bad or indifferent. One could argue that we spend more on public services so, of course, that will be a higher proportion of our budget, but that does not always make for better outcomes, does it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
I think that other members want to talk about the performance framework, outcomes and so on, and they are interesting areas that we will come on to cover.
Other analysis tends to suggest that Scotland has an ageing and relatively unhealthy population, and that that could present a potential risk to resource budgets in future in meeting healthcare and support needs for an ageing workforce that is not getting healthier. Has Audit Scotland undertaken any analysis on more of a medium-to-longer-term view of the Scottish public budget and whether that is a trend that we should be concerned about and, therefore, flag to Government?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Does public sector reform sound like cutting jobs in the public sector?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Indeed.
The total cost of the upgrade has not changed much since we last spoke about it. It is around £2.2 million. My primary concern is that you have not negotiated a price for the product, yet you are still quite confident about how much it will cost. How does that work?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Jamie Greene
Does that account for your legal and professional fees jumping by a third, year on year?