The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 447 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Donald Cameron
Arguably, the bill would simply allow the Scottish Government to flip whatever retained EU law exists into a new form of law, without any of that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Donald Cameron
I have two questions, which are basically variations on Mark Ruskell’s question. There is speculation in the media that, if there is to be an extension, the date will be 2026. That is four years from now. Notwithstanding what has just been said, would most people be in favour of that date? I accept that some people do not want any date or have fundamental issues with the bill. That is my first question.
My second question is about engagement with the Scottish Government, which Elspeth Macdonald spoke about. Has there been any contact or engagement with the Scottish Government, given that, under the bill, it will have the ability to restate retained EU law? Obviously, there are devolved competencies involved. In the light of our understanding that it is the Scottish Government’s policy to align with EU law, has there been any engagement with the Scottish Government and/or its agencies?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Donald Cameron
Thank you for those contributions.
I want to move on to the work on tracking EU legislation, which the committee has begun. The cabinet secretary mentioned that in his opening statement. We are about to embark on the very wide administrative task of trying to track EU legislation on behalf of the Parliament, which will involve a huge number of staff and a huge amount of resources. However, that work cannot exist in a vacuum. It is, of course, a response to the Scottish Government’s policy to align, and it is not for us as a Parliament to lead that work; we are here to scrutinise what the Government does.
Can the cabinet secretary or any of the officials give us more detail than is present in the annual report on the work that the Scottish Government is doing to analyse and track EU legislation, especially as—as has been mentioned—there are various routes to alignment and not just the power that we are considering today? Does the cabinet secretary want to start on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Donald Cameron
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I am delighted to hear that you are in London meeting UK Government ministers and officials.
On the subject of keeping pace, you spoke at the start of your evidence about the principle and conviction—I think you said that—of staying close to Europe. However, under the annual report, you have chosen not to align with EU legislation, so it appears that, although your Government’s stated intention is to align with EU law, that is not the policy that you are following. In this instance, it concerns the EU energy performance of buildings directive.
I think that that approach is commendable, but it leaves a huge question mark for Scottish businesses and organisations and civic Scotland, which will have uncertainty if they do not know whether the Scottish Government is going to align or not. I would like your response to that point, please.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Donald Cameron
What is the alternative here? Is the realistic alternative to leave retained EU law on the statute book and in force, so that slowly, over time, the UK, Scottish and Welsh Governments can pick off what they want to remove and leave what they want to remain?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Donald Cameron
Can I check whether our witnesses online can hear us?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Donald Cameron
It is for all the witnesses.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Donald Cameron
Do you want to add to that, Dr Hancox?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Donald Cameron
I refer to my entry in the register of members’ interests: I am a member of the Faculty of Advocates.
I want to pick up on Mr Livingstone’s final point. Obviously, the Scottish Government has the ability to “keep pace” with EU law, and it is the stated policy of the Scottish Government to align with EU law. The Scottish Government has the ability to do so in the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Continuity) (Scotland) Act 2021. I am interested in the relationship between the Scottish Government’s existing ability to align with EU law and the potential under the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill for the Scottish Government and others to restate retained EU law. Do you have any further observations on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Donald Cameron
Could I bring in Professor Alison Young on the same questions, please?