The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1281 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand. Thank you. The key point, it feels to me—I appreciate that we will go to debate in a minute—is that the fines raised do not come back to the DRS specifically, perhaps to help that scheme or to help producers or whatever.
Who is the arbiter of whether a breach of the order merits a criminal prosecution or requires a civil prosecution? “Prosecution” is the wrong word, but you know what I mean. Will SEPA be the arbiter of that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Will the minister take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I agree with you: it is unhelpful or unfortunate, perhaps, that we have both of these orders together. This is the intervention that I was going to put to Jackie Dunbar: how do you deal with the convener’s point about SEPA and resourcing and becoming judge and jury? What is your response to the convener’s challenge?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I will briefly follow up on that question. David Hibbert talked about unbundling and tendering. Do you have any thoughts on the structure of how we procure and deliver ferry services in Scotland, particularly in your jurisdiction? Do you have any views on the Transport Scotland-CMAL circle—or, in this case, matrix? Is there a better way in which that could be structured, or is that structure the right one?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Moraig Lyall, I will throw you the same question but add to it that the committee has heard about the possibility of—I cannot remember exactly how it was described—the operator of the service bringing in its own vessels. Do you have any thoughts on what David has just provided?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I am grateful.
Before I hand back to the convener, I have a final question for Angus Duncan Campbell. Angus, as you rightly brought this up, do you have anything to say on the weather resilience piece and whether CalMac is becoming more risk averse, particularly having heard the useful answer that Kirsty MacFarlane has just given?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for that answer. I might come back to you in a moment on exactly that point.
Kirsty, we have heard Angus Duncan Campbell talk about weather resilience, and I note your comments at the beginning of this evidence session about the challenges that you would have faced had you attended in person today. The committee has heard suggestions that CalMac is becoming more reluctant to sail in adverse weather. Do you think that that is happening? In any event, does CalMac listen to representations from the community board about sailing in adverse conditions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
Roy, I will cut you off there. It is very interesting, but there will be questions on staff later that my colleagues will pick up with you.
I have a final question, which is for Dr Baird. The 2012 ferries plan is due to be replaced by the islands connectivity plan, and ferries will be part of that. However, there is a separate draft long-term plan for vessels and ports, which has been given to key stakeholders for consultation. Do you have a view on whether it is optimal to consult on the two documents separately, and should it be done with only key stakeholders having access to one at this stage? Should the documents be separate at all?
10:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
On that point, you made some interesting comments earlier about procurement involving—or not involving—catamarans, for example. Is it your understanding that the consultations are picking up that procurement issue, with a view to analysing whether the problems that you suggest exist and, if they exist, what to do about them, or are those consultations not the best way to do that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
Good morning, panel. I would like to go back to something that Neil Kay said in his introductory remarks. The current set-up has CalMac Ferries and Serco operating services, but the vessels are owned by CMAL, and various ports and harbours are also under that organisation. Is that the best model for running services and, if not, why not?