Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 5 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1112 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill

Meeting date: 4 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Good morning. Lloyd Austin, you began your answer to Monica Lennon by briefly mentioning EU legislation. The Scottish Government took a decision to keep pace with EU law. What impact would the bill’s provisions have on that decision? If it turned out that the provisions enhanced and improved protections, would it be right—as I assume that it would be—for the Scottish Government to use those protections rather than to dogmatically follow the EU’s position?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill

Meeting date: 4 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Lloyd Austin, I will go back to the first question that I asked you. You answered the second part of the question by saying that it was a hypothetical question. However, the first part of the question was about the impact that the provisions will have on the Scottish Government’s decision to keep pace with EU law. I do not think that that is a hypothetical question.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Given the potential for risk and significant delays in evaluating authorisations, why has the Scottish Government not engaged or consulted with stakeholders to assess the impact of the proposals?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Forgive me, minister, but may I press you on that? The type 1 notification that you submitted to the committee says:

“these new measures are aimed solely at ensuring the functioning of the GB BPR and, therefore, we have not undertaken any engagement, or any formal consultation, about these specific amendments.”

That seems rather at odds with the answer that you have just given. Can you clarify the point?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill

Meeting date: 4 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Thank you. Robbie Calvert, Lloyd Austin talked about clause 120 and suggested, I think, that it could be amended to make it better. In your view, clause 120 sets out safeguards that will ensure that the UK continues to meet its international obligations and includes provisions on non-regression, which are also in the UK-EU trade and co-operation agreement. Does clause 120 provide sufficient safeguards against the weakening of existing environmental protections?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 October 2022

Liam Kerr

Forgive me, minister, but the type 1 notification says that there has been no formal consultation.

I think that I understand what you are saying. You are saying that the opportunity is there, but the actual engagement and consultation have not, in fact, been carried out, as has been notified to the committee through the type 1 notification. Is that correct?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Programme for Government

Meeting date: 27 September 2022

Liam Kerr

I am grateful.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Role of Local Government in Delivering Net Zero

Meeting date: 27 September 2022

Liam Kerr

Good morning, panel. The cabinet secretary talked about resources to councils and Ben Macpherson talked about ring fencing. We heard from COSLA last week that 70 per cent, I think, of funding that goes to local authorities is ring fenced. It suggested to the committee that

“fewer, but larger and more flexible funding streams”

would better facilitate the just transition to net zero. On that specific point, first, is there a way in which the Scottish Government can provide more flexibility within the current funding arrangements? Secondly, is it your view that fewer but more flexible and larger funding streams would be a better mechanism? In any event, do you foresee any risks of fewer but more flexible arrangements?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Programme for Government

Meeting date: 27 September 2022

Liam Kerr

I will be very brief. The three new ScotWind developments in Shetland that were announced last month will reportedly raise £56 million in option fees. As you will know, ScotWind money is key to just transition and the skills transfer that you have mentioned, but in the public sector pay and emergency budget review, the Deputy First Minister specifically said that he would take £56 million generated by ScotWind to plug holes in budgets elsewhere. What impact do you envisage taking that £56 million will have on just transition and developing the pathway and skills that you have just talked to the deputy convener about?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Programme for Government

Meeting date: 27 September 2022

Liam Kerr

I am grateful. Cabinet secretary, you mentioned highly protected marine areas in your answer. Last year’s programme for government said that it would establish

“a world-leading suite of Highly Protected Marine Areas”,

which would eventually cover 10 per cent of Scotland’s seas. I believe that, to date, none has been established. Why is that, and what progress can we expect imminently?