The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1112 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
Good morning, panel. I would like to take on the question that you have just been asked while picking up on something that several witnesses have mentioned to do with service design and provision. You may have heard earlier that services could be designed differently. Perhaps the vessels or the harbours could have a different specification. Does the community board have any input to decisions on those things? If so, are its suggestions being taken on?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
Good morning, panel. I would like to go back to something that Neil Kay said in his introductory remarks. The current set-up has CalMac Ferries and Serco operating services, but the vessels are owned by CMAL, and various ports and harbours are also under that organisation. Is that the best model for running services and, if not, why not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
That is all very helpful.
Angus Duncan Campbell, you made some comments earlier on exactly that point. Is your community telling CMAL what vessels and services are needed? If so, are CMAL and CalMac listening and responding?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
On that point, you made some interesting comments earlier about procurement involving—or not involving—catamarans, for example. Is it your understanding that the consultations are picking up that procurement issue, with a view to analysing whether the problems that you suggest exist and, if they exist, what to do about them, or are those consultations not the best way to do that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
With deep respect, Dr Baird, I think that we will have to get on. We need to stick to the point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I have no further questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2023
Liam Kerr
That argument having been made, I will go right back to the issue raised in the convener’s question. You have been talking to the UK Government about the issue for about six months now. Do you have a sense that the argument is being heard and that there is sympathy for it? Do you have any sense of how this is going to go at this stage?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I am grateful for those answers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand the point that you are making. However, if we start from saying that the powers relate to devolved areas so there is a significant degree of seriousness to what is proposed, might there be an argument for saying that, rather than limiting consent to the Scottish ministers, the Scottish Parliament should have a role in considering any such proposals?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2023
Liam Kerr
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I have a couple of questions. Throughout the bill—but particularly in part 7, which concerns heat networks—the Scottish Government looks to change the wording in the provisions from
“the Secretary of State is to consult the Scottish Ministers”
to “the Secretary of State must obtain the consent of the Scottish Ministers”.
Will you help the committee to understand what the practical implications would be of sticking with consultation over seeking consent? Is there a standard approach? Is it usual to consult, is it usual to seek consent or is there no standard?