The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1112 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Yes. I have a brief question about something that came out of the earlier session. When you were watching that session, minister, I am sure that you heard that CMAL did not stipulate in the contract for the new ferries in Turkey that, where possible, the Scottish and/or UK supply chain should be used. Would the Scottish Government have preferred to see that clause in the contract? Would it prefer to see such clauses used in the future? If so, have you indicated that to CMAL?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand—thank you. Sticking with that press release, I note that, later on, it says:
“We will only ever order the vessels best suited to the routes and communities they are intended to serve.”
In previous evidence sessions, the committee heard from various communities that CMAL is procuring vessels and hardware improvements that appear not to be the best, or that do not accord with consultations that have taken place. If that is correct, how come there is a disconnect between CMAL’s position as stated in that press release, for example, and what appears to be the perceived reality?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand, but it was for CMAL to put a stipulation in the contract to say that, if it is possible to use Scottish suppliers, that should be the preference. It was for CMAL to make that decision.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I would be very grateful for that.
I understand the point that is being made and I accept, minister, that, if it was an open tendering process, that is fine. However, at some point, a decision was made. As I understand it, the contract is a standard Baltic and International Maritime Council one. I presume that, at some point, CMAL could have said as part of the negotiation that it wished to add a clause that said that, wherever possible, the yard would use the UK or Scottish supply chain. It has not done that. As a Government minister, would you have preferred that it had? In any event, when other procurement exercises take place, would you prefer CMAL to stipulate, as part of the contract negotiations, that UK and/or Scottish supply chains need to be used?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Thank you. The substantive question that I have at this stage is about Transport Scotland’s consultation on the “Islands Connectivity Plan: Long-Term Plan for Vessels and Ports on the Clyde & Hebrides and Northern Isles networks (2023-2045)”, which states:
“We will reduce the average age of the fleet to around 15 years by the end of this decade.”
How does CMAL intend to achieve that, particularly given the chair’s earlier comment that it is for the operator to dictate the spec?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Given that, the question begged is simply whether Transport Scotland’s statement on its aim to reduce the average age of the fleet to 15 years by the end of the decade will be realised, particularly given the funding situation that you alluded to, Kevin.
09:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
There has certainly been a suggestion that some of what has been ordered historically and is likely to be ordered going forward is not best suited to particular routes or particular facilities. It would be interesting to hear your view on that. Can you explain to the committee how you ensure, and will ensure, that whatever is procured, whether we are talking about vessels or harbours, is best suited to the particular routes and communities that it will serve?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
I understand the answer, but I will press you on that. I asked you what is the new inflationary cost of the plans on the long-term plan that is still at the working-draft stage. Should the Government not be very quickly assessing the fact that CMAL thinks that there is a £1.4 billion cost? We are in inflationary times, so when will you be able to revert to CMAL and say: “Okay, here is what is happening with inflation, so here is the real cost, if we are to achieve what you have set out in the long-term plan”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Liam Kerr
Good morning, minister. To follow on from that questioning from Mark Ruskell, the current CHFS contract ends in October 2024. Where are we when it comes to future planning for the service delivery and the process of tendering? Will it be a problem, or is there a concern, that the contract is—presumably—in the planning stages now, before the islands connectivity plan or the long-term plan are finalised, or even before they are at the working draft stage?
11:00