Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1198 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

Does the minister have any concerns that the amendments could restrict press freedom?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

Will the member take an intervention?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

But that principle is not offended by amendments 189 and 190. To say that it is, is factually incorrect, is it not?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

Amendment 179 is another of Russell Findlay’s amendments that I will speak to, as he is unable to be with us today.

This amendment relates to the principle of transparency with regard to open justice. As I explained earlier on amendment 189, victims groups have raised serious concerns about an information vacuum in relation to the panel system. As was set out earlier, more criminal cases will be dealt with by the panel, and that number will increase as a result of the rise in the age.

Scotland’s courts are public buildings. They are open to the public, with proceedings conducted, by and large, in public—that is the default position, albeit that there are important safeguards in place. Judges are, of course, able to conduct proceedings in private and to issue other orders where relevant in relation to victims and witnesses, but the principle remains that transparency is fundamental to open justice, and that must be cherished. Amendment 179 simply seeks to extend that transparency to the panel system, which is increasingly dealing with cases—often serious—of a criminal nature. Crucially, the amendment caveats that by ensuring that the chair will still be able to refuse attendance when that is in the best interests of the child.

I move amendment 179.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

How does the principle that the minister has just elaborated stack up against the caveat in section (2) of the amendment, which would allow the chair to make the appropriate decision in the best interests of the child?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

I have listened very carefully to what the minister has to say, and she says that she does not agree with the premise of the amendment, but the premise of open justice and transparency is core. Russell Findlay has also put in, very clearly—

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

We can both look at the Official Report afterwards to check what I noted down when the minister was speaking.

The caveat that Russell Findlay has put into amendment 179 is clear and unequivocal: it gives the chair appropriate jurisdiction over the hearings over which the chair presides. That utterly destroys the minister’s argument that there is, in some way, an erosion of rights. Therefore, I press amendment 179, in Russell Findlay’s name.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 24 January 2024

Liam Kerr

Because the principle that the Government opposes is supported by Victim Support Scotland, the legal basis provided by the minister is dubious at best and drafting ambiguities can be cleared at stage 3, I will move amendment 189.

Amendment 189 moved—[Liam Kerr].

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2024-25 and Education Reform

Meeting date: 17 January 2024

Liam Kerr

Good morning. The budget proposes a £28.5 million cut to the teaching grant for universities. Yesterday, the finance secretary hesitantly quantified that as equating to about 1,200 first-year student places, but others have suggested that the figure could be more than 3,500. Given that this is your portfolio, cabinet secretary, you must have calculated this: how many young Scots will not have a place at Scottish universities going forward?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2024-25 and Education Reform

Meeting date: 17 January 2024

Liam Kerr

One thing that is certain is that, working within the total capped numbers, funding to Scottish universities for each Scottish student place is less than the cost to the university of providing that place. It is 19 per cent less in real terms than it was in 2013-14, and it is about 21 per cent less than the funding for English universities. Given that, does the cabinet secretary worry that this budget will make Scottish universities ever more dependent on international students? If so, what plans does she have to address that?