The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1112 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
I am absolutely comfortable with the SSI. However, the committee has heard from the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association, the SCTS and the Law Society of Scotland that the courts will not be ready to return to pre-pandemic time limits. Does the Scottish Government accept that? If so, cabinet secretary, how will you support the return to those time limits? Do you think that the courts will be ready by November?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
I understand. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
I have a quick question for Helena Farrand Carrapico. Your presentation said that we need to
“Develop the necessary technical capabilities with a view to sharing vehicle registration data”
with the EU. That is on slide 5. It went on to state that we need to
“Negotiate access to the ECRIS-TCN system”.
How challenging would it be to develop those technical capabilities, and would it be challenging and/or costly to negotiate access to that system?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
That would be fascinating to read.
I put a related point to Gemma Davies. Your report refers to human rights issues. Page 36 indicates that
“For outgoing extradition requests ... The Extradition Act 2003 includes an additional ground for challenging extradition: the possibility of contesting the Scottish Ministers’ decision ... on the basis that it is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This provision, unique to Scotland, does not exist in England and Wales.”
The report goes on to say that the provision adds complexity. Will you help the committee to understand whether it bites? If so, what do you recommend that the committee does? Do we note it but keep it as best practice, or are you recommending that we align with England and Wales on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
Do not worry.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
I will press you on that, because the committee aims to help the Scottish Government do its job. Bullet point 3 on page 8 of your report specifically suggests that we should write to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs and the Lord Advocate to highlight that
“poor prison conditions in Scotland have led to requests for assurances”.
I am trying to understand what specific prison conditions were raised in the three occasions in which requests were made.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
Good morning to you both, and thank you for your presentation. I will put my question to Professor Davies, because it is about something that you spoke to in your presentation. Bullet point 3 on page 8 of your report says that
“poor prison conditions in Scotland have led to requests for assurances in extradition/surrender cases. This is causing delay in Scotland receiving wanted persons from overseas and increases the risk that extradition is refused.”
The detail of that is at page 36, where you go on to mention
“the increased frequency of challenges related to prison conditions.”
That will be hugely concerning for the committee to read, because I think that you are suggesting that conditions in Scottish prisons are raising human rights issues and challenges to extradition. Will you tell the committee more about exactly what you are getting at? What are the specific issues? How big a problem is it, and what does the Scottish Government need to do, and by when, to address it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
I would be grateful for that—thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Liam Kerr
That is perfectly fair. It is really so that the committee can say to the Scottish Government, “Listen, this is what the experts are saying that you need to address.”