The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1103 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
But Ineos told the committee that it approached the Scottish and UK Governments five years ago. With all due respect, Ed Miliband came in 10 months ago, and I am talking about the work undertaken in the past five years. The company told the committee that it had approached both Governments, seeking a Government-backed plan to transition from fossil fuel refining to low-carbon manufacturing in Grangemouth; it said that
“that piece of work would have had to have been done five years ago ... but”
it
“did not move on.”—[Official Report, Economy and Fair Work Committee, 13 November 2024; c 29.]
What you are saying is that responsibility for that lay with the company, not with the two Governments.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Our next item of business is an evidence session on Grangemouth’s industrial future. Following the announcement that the refinery at Grangemouth would transition to a finished fuels import terminal and distribution hub, both the Scottish and United Kingdom Governments agreed to support a feasibility study, known as project willow, on the different options for the industrial future of Grangemouth. Last month, the committee heard evidence from Michael Shanks MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Energy.
Today, I am delighted to welcome Gillian Martin, Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy. The cabinet secretary is joined by Scottish Government officials Chris Bryceland, team leader, critical energy infrastructure, and Kenneth MacDermid, head of critical energy infrastructure; and by Jan Robertson, Grangemouth director for Scottish Enterprise. As always, I appeal to members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as brief as possible.
The Acorn project is an integral part of the transition at Grangemouth. I do not want to pre-empt any announcements that might be made today, but there have been reports that the UK Government will commit substantial funding to the Acorn carbon capture project. The Scottish Government’s previous pledge of £80 million was in the programme for government but not in the budget. Is that commitment still there? Why has there been no Scottish Government investment in the project to date?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
At the weekend, the Sunday Post reported that the Scottish Government changed its position from saying that £80 million was on the table to adding the caveat that it was contingent on the UK Government confirming a full funding package and timeline in the spending review. It reported that that was as a result of discussions with your former coalition partners, who put pressure on you to water down that commitment. Is that not true?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Will you be first in the queue with that £80 million as well?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
That is an issue about our capacity. Thank you for that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Jane Martin, I appreciate that Scottish Enterprise is a national body, but do you have a view on the current procurement thresholds and community benefit requirements? Are those a hindrance to community wealth building? Is that something that you come across when working with local business?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Dr Crighton, do you want to come back in? I see that your hand is raised.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Absolutely.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
I want to follow up on that point, Dr Crighton. You make the valid point that the bill will not change the current procurement rules. It has been put to us by witnesses on visits that the current procurement rules are, frankly, a hindrance, and that there is not enough power in the bill to move the dial on local spend. There is no requirement to do that, even with the bill, because you are covered by existing procurement law. Is there an argument that that needs to change? Do you think that it will happen?
Based on current procurement laws, you are not very confident that you will definitely get a significant rise in local spend. Therefore, do we need to change those laws to, for example, strengthen community benefit requirements or look at thresholds again to really move the dial on local spend through public sector procurement?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Smyth
But there is no requirement for you to do that under current legislation, is there?