The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1103 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
That is very helpful.
I have a question for Duncan Thorp. In its written submission, Social Enterprise Scotland suggests that there is a risk-averse culture in some procurement departments and, perhaps, a preconceived notion of what a social enterprise is, which limits the desire to award contracts to social enterprises. Will you expand on that point? Do you have any evidence on what the scale of the problem is?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
That is helpful. Notwithstanding the challenges of measuring something for which we do not have a consistent definition, based on the work you have done with public sector organisations and the best practice that is out there, can you say a bit about the scale of fair trade products being bought by the public sector within its multibillion pound procurement? Does that scale match our ambition as a nation to be a fair trade nation?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
I would like to follow up on the point about fair work. To what extent have the 2014 act and the changes to the procurement process helped to embed fair work? We have talked about the fact that the main barrier is the absence of multiyear funding, but to what extent has the 2014 act embedded fair work in the practices not only of the awarding authorities but of the organisations that bid for contracts? I take on board the issue of multiyear funding, but what else can we do within the process to expand the adoption of fair work?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
You have all talked about the fact that there are many organisations that are not even involved in public procurement because of the barriers. Is fair work a barrier to some of those organisations?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
That is helpful.
10:30Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Smyth
My colleague has some questions on gender inequality so you are not getting off lightly, but I want to pursue the points around fair trade. Although it is not a declarable interest, I want to put on the record that I am the convener of the cross-party group on fair trade and I also chair the Dumfries and Galloway fair trade steering group.
I almost feel a wee bit under pressure to answer Martin Rhodes’s question about how we pursue that definition. Just on that point, Martin, is guidance enough or do we need to underpin that definition legally through legislation to make sure it does translate into practice across public procurement?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Colin Smyth
If a land manager wishes a licence for conservation reasons, amendment 143 would not impact on that whatsoever. That important point needs to be made.
I am not surprised that the Conservatives do not agree with the amendment, because they want to maximise the level of kill. I appreciate that, but I have to say that I am disappointed that the Greens and SNP seem to share that position. Despite the fact that I know that the minister has no—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Colin Smyth
Is Edward Mountain saying that the only way in which we can manage wildlife and our land is through killing animals? Is that his argument?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Colin Smyth
The equivalent of more than 200,000 football pitches is subject to muirburn purely to maintain and increase grouse. About 40 per cent of that takes place on deep peat, which is defined as having a depth greater than 50cm. Ending unnecessary muirburn to maintain and increase grouse will not prevent anyone from shooting grouse but will mean that our vital peatlands are afforded far greater protection, while muirburn can still continue for the other legitimate reasons that are set out in the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2024
Colin Smyth
I take on board the point that Kate Forbes makes. As she was a member of the committee at the time, she will be aware that the Government gave assurances in evidence that, even without a licence, muirburn can still be an emergency tool to respond to wildfires. If a land manager wants to obtain a licence for muirburn for genuine conservation reasons, amendment 143 would not affect that in any way.
The amendment backs what I believe we all agree the bill should set out to achieve, which is to ensure that the management of grouse moors and related activities are undertaken in an environmentally sustainable and welfare-conscious way.