The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1103 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Our next item of business is our third evidence session on the Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill.
We will hear from two panels, and I am delighted to welcome our first panel: Stacey Dingwall, head of policy and external affairs at the Federation of Small Businesses Scotland; Matt Pearce, board member at the Development Trusts Association Scotland; Adrian Sargent, chief executive officer of Castle Community Bank; and—joining us online—Morven Taylor, acting chief executive officer of Communities Housing Trust.
As always, I appeal to members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as concise as possible. I ask the deputy convener to kick off the questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
That is interesting. I will bring in Daniel Johnson.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
I bring in Lorna Slater.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
I will pick up on one of those points, Gail Macgregor, you noted the concerns around procurement thresholds. Is that something that COSLA feels that the bill could try to tackle by ensuring greater flexibility or perhaps just mandating economic impact considerations with regard to procurement? Would that strengthen your ability to support SMEs more in local areas? Do you see the bill as an opportunity to amend some of that stuff on procurement?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Thank you. I will now bring in Murdo Fraser.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
That is useful. I am sure that I will make a submission to Dumfries and Galloway Council’s review of its mothballing policy in due course—
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
You will be pleased to know that that brings us to the end of our evidence session. I thank our witnesses very much. It has been a fascinating discussion and, more significantly, it has been really helpful in our consideration of the bill. Thank you so much indeed for your input.
I suspend the meeting for a changeover of witnesses.
10:56 Meeting suspended.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
I will turn to a point from your submission. On rural aspects, you said:
“There is a view from some of our members that unintended consequences could be more likely in rural areas”.
Will you expand on those concerns from some of your members?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Our final evidence session will be with the minister, next week, and we will compile our report after that. Thank you so much.
11:45 Meeting continued in private until 12:26.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Colin Smyth
Our fundamental concern is what may change in the bill. On that point, should there be a duty in the bill, for example, for anchor organisations to co-design their action plan? Should that be specified in the bill?