The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1555 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
That is fine. I just wondered whether you wanted to comment.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
I will follow on from my colleagues’ questions and pick up a couple of the arguments that were made in response to the committee’s call for views. Some arguments were made that the rules on giving notice should be the same for both tenants and landlords, which differs from the approach that is taken in the bill. Rachel Rayner, what is your opinion on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
I understand.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
Nothing changes in that regard, then.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Rona Mackay
The situation would be different in the Scottish Parliament, which is much smaller.
I am coming to the end of my second session in the Parliament, so, at the risk of sounding a bit creepy, I want to say that the back-up from the committee clerks and research teams has been exemplary. We could not have asked for more, and I think that everyone feels like that. We have fantastic committee back-up.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Rona Mackay
To be honest, it could not really be any other way—we have to be realistic about that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Rona Mackay
It is really interesting to hear how everything operates.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Rona Mackay
It was in 2016.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Rona Mackay
When was the change introduced?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Rona Mackay
Good morning, panel. I will probably be the last questioner, so I will just leave you with a few take-aways from what we have been discussing. We have 129 MSPs in the Parliament. I am the chief whip of the party that is in government, and all my members are on two or three committees, as we have talked about. They are populated through the d’Hondt system, which means that, as the convener has just referenced, the largest party gets the most committee members, so I work with 36 back benchers on 16 committees.
I do not agree with my colleague Sue Webber. I think that we do need more MSPs, because our workload is increasing, which is, thankfully, due to increased powers and so on. Nearly all our committees have a full legislative agenda, which leaves very little time for inquiries, scrutiny or things that we should be doing and would like to do but simply do not have the time or people to do. I am totally in favour of gender balance, and I am on the gender-sensitive advisory panel, but you can only work with the members that you have. At the moment, we have quite a good gender balance across the Parliament. It might not be like that in the next session, and the points that we have just been talking about will be really important right at the start, when we will need to look at the practicalities.
As chief whip, I allocate places on committees, and I try to ensure gender balance where I can, but that is not always possible. Sometimes, the logistics do not add up for you to do exactly what you would want to. Stephen Holden Bates raised the issue of substitute members, which are really necessary in this Parliament because we have such a big legislative workload, and bills go to committees at stage 2. If someone is off ill, as happens in every workplace, we have to have somebody who can step in.
That is just a wee synopsis of what we have been talking about. My questions relate to the role of conveners, the move to having elected conveners, how that is working in other legislatures and the remuneration aspect. Diana, what has been the impact of the introduction of elections and remuneration for committee chairs in the Senedd, and how has it affected the role?