The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1555 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
My question was just on that one aspect.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
That is interesting. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
Fergus Colquhoun spoke about litigation being more possible in certain circumstances.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
Yes, because we all like to have something to look at when we have made an agreement, I guess.
I get the impression from what has been said on that particular aspect of giving notice that it could create more litigious tenants. Does it give them the opportunity to say, “That’s not right, and I am going to take it further”? As the bill stands, could that happen?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
Thanks very much for that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
I would like clarification on that. At the moment, does the tenant have to give written notice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
Would that be more preferable for the landlord or the tenant? I am trying to get an idea of what the power balance would be.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
So, it could be disputed.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
Good morning. I was going to ask you the same question that I asked of David Bartos about responses to the call for views, in which some arguments were made about tenants and landlords being given the same amount of time, and about whether oral notice of the ending of a lease could be given by a tenant who has a lease of less than one year. However, I am not going to ask you about that, because, from what you have said, I think that I have gathered what the answer is.
I am mindful that, in relation to one of the rules—I cannot remember which—David Bartos said that there was no change. I had said something like, “But does that not happen just now? Does the landlord not have to give written notice?”, and he said yes. In that sense, therefore, on that particular aspect, nothing changes. Am I correct in that, or am I getting confused?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Rona Mackay
I was going to ask about that third issue, of which there is criticism in some of the responses to the call for views.