The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 990 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
I hope that that extends to ministers as well.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
If it is okay, convener, I will share with the committee some of the granular employability data, because a lot of that is linked with some of the other points that Michelle Thomson has made. It has an impact on employment, ultimately. It also has an impact on challenges for women. After all, if somebody goes through an employability scheme, whether they stay in work a year later is nearly always indicative of wider pressures. There might be something interesting in that.
I do not know whether Colin Cook has anything to add.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
It is a big moment.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
It is certainly one of the drivers—it is certainly up there, near the top, if not the top.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
The past five years have been extremely challenging for businesses because of higher costs, including energy costs and, more recently, the hike in national insurance contributions, although I think that the impact of that will be seen in the years to come. Many businesses struggled hugely during Covid and, unfortunately, some did not make it.
10:00Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
In the first half of this year, we were second only to the north-east of England and, in 2025, there has been an 18 per cent increase in new business incorporations.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
I will need to come back to you with the data on that. We have a lot of small businesses but, by and large, the bulk of the workforce is employed by the bigger businesses.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
Let me go further than that. I agree that SMEs are the backbone of the Scottish economy. I also agree that productivity is critical, so let us unpack what drives productivity growth. First, technology and the adoption of digital technology; secondly, skills—in other words, people having the right skills for the right job and the ability to perform at the level that they need to—and thirdly, reinvestment of business profits, which I think that you are going to come on to. Those are three drivers of productivity. There are also other drivers, such as infrastructure.
My overall budget, if you include capital, is £1.3 billion. Immediately, you have to look more broadly than simply at my portfolio. We have to look at skills, training, wider infrastructure investment and digital adoption. I can do things such as support digitalisation and digital adoption in tech. When I refer to the tech industry, we should bear in mind that most industries are now tech industries. Yesterday, I spoke about the growth in med tech, for example. The £1.3 billion is delivering significant results, but it is much broader than that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
I might disagree with the premise—I think that the approaches that we have taken have had an impact. Scotland’s productivity has outperformed that of all regions of the UK over a 20-year period, recording an average growth in real output per hour of 1.5 per cent per annum. Despite that, productivity is still below the national average, and that is what we need to focus on. My argument is that what we have been doing has had an impact, but we need to recognise that the challenges that businesses are facing right now require a slightly different approach. AI is a new opportunity and a challenge.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Kate Forbes
I think that GDP remains a useful indicator of economic growth, but I do not think that it is the only indicator, largely because it is measured on a national basis. The whole point of community wealth building is that we want to understand the drivers of local prosperity. We want to know that, where a particular local community is thriving, that is having an obvious social impact. That is what Mr McKee was probably getting at, although I did not see the exchange. GDP remains useful but, on a community level, a number of metrics can be used. Mr McKee is driving the bill, so he will be doing the consultation, but there are a number of useful metrics for unemployment, economic inactivity and poverty, and those are massive indicators of economic prosperity. There will be statistics in and around the number of businesses, and I imagine that each of those local businesses will contribute to more local infrastructure development.
There are a lot of metrics and I assume that, as part of the community wealth building consultation process and the bill process, there will be a lot of discussions about how we measure the wealth that we want communities to build through that bill.