The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1448 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I did not. I answered that question previously.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I will follow up the point that you made about the Scottish Association of the Teachers of History. I have had correspondence from a number of history teachers that referenced SATH and I was very keen to hear the association’s views. Although the Government accepts the findings of the SQA’s review, I am keen to work with the history teaching profession and to hear its feedback. It is hugely important that it is part of the process and of what comes next.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
My understanding is that the organisation has undertaken its own survey. I did not commission that, but we have asked for feedback.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I am happy to forgo, if that is helpful to the committee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I would like to know the detail.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
That is fine. In that case, I presume that you have looked in detail at the content of the report, Ms Duncan-Glancy, because I have not yet been presented with an evidence base to substantiate my instructing the chief examiner to lead an independent review. If you have that evidence base, I am happy to consider it. I have also asked SATH for further follow-up information. However, from my reading of the report, I have not been presented with that evidence.
I go back to the point that the convener made about the variation in pass rates. Is the committee trying to make the point that, if the pass rate varies by 13 per cent in one year, we should automatically have reviews into every subject area?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
That question is probably best directed to Ms Robertson in the first instance, although I am happy to come back to the point about independence and how we can provide objectivity, because it is a fair point.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
The evidence base of the report has not been in contention today—I have not heard that from members. However, I am happy to hear from history teachers. I did that through my engagement with SATH, but I put on the record again that I am keen to hear from history teachers directly on the issue. The evidence base that I have been presented with and which we have discussed throughout today’s session does not tell me of the challenges that you have spoken to today, convener, and it does not necessarily reflect some of the other views that you have heard. However, I do not discount those views, and I am more than happy to hear from those teachers.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
As the committee will be aware, Richard Harry, the executive director of qualifications and assessment in the Welsh exam board, carried out an independent peer review of the report. Fiona Robertson can speak about the detail of the methodology that was applied, because the methodology for the independent peer review was decided by the SQA, not by the Scottish Government.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
It is therefore quite unique.
I take the member’s point on board, but the issue that I have as cabinet secretary is that the report that I have been presented with does not present a substantive evidence base for me to issue a directive. I think that that is the point that the member is making. If that evidence base exists, I will consider it. However, the report that I have been presented with, which is a rigorous report—I am sure that all committee members have read it in detail—looks very thoroughly at the question paper, at the marking guidelines and at how they were applied. I do not have—