The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1491 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Officials might want to comment on that but, to my mind, the powers give us the ability to deal with unintended consequences. If you were going to ask me about possible scenarios, I could not tell you what they might be, because they are unknown unknowns at this point. If we look at the history and why we are here, we can see that everybody looked at the matter in a lot of detail in the run-up to the 2024 act, but there are clearly unintended consequences that we are working through now. Where those are minor, the regulation-making powers give us the ability to go through a process and make changes without having to produce more primary legislation.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Yes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
No. Local authorities have the ability to add further exemptions if they decide that that makes sense locally. That is the right approach, because it gives them that flexibility. The regulations are about a technical issue in the disability exemptions, which clarifies the definition of the scope. David Storrie might want to talk to that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Officials can keep me right on the technicalities, but local authorities have the ability to do that themselves. In the scenarios that you are painting, local authorities would have that power, and they will be able to judge whether they want to use that locally.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Separate legislation would be needed if we chose to take those forward.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
We have been through a consultation process on the cruise ship levy that is being considered and analysed as we speak. Clearly, with an election coming up, that would fall into the post-election period. Any future Government will look at the consultation and its results and decide how it wants to proceed.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
I would be happy to take evidence on that and consider it. However, to go back to the point that we made earlier about proportionality in the scheme, if some people are paying £300 or £400 a night for a hotel room—or even more—where would that national cap be set? We need to be cognisant of the fact that a national cap could, to some extent, militate against proportionality on very expensive accommodation. We are interested to hear views on a cap, but it is more complicated than the assumption that that would keep prices down for those in lower-priced accommodation.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Fiona, do you want to say anything?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
At the core of the bill is the ability for local authorities to operate a tiered flat-rate system instead of, or alongside, a percentage-based system. That has the benefit of increasing flexibility and simplicity. Businesses were calling out for local authorities to have the ability to implement a flat-rate system where they felt it was the right thing to do. As I say, that is the core change that we are making. It gives local authorities more scope in designing the levy, but it also allows businesses to engage with local authorities through the consultation and make the case for a fixed-rate system where they feel it is more appropriate.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ivan McKee
Sorry, are you asking about the three sets of regulations?