The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
Staying in the same area, I wonder whether the criminal justice board has discussed the possibility of utilising video technology when taking expert witness statements or statements from police officers either live or in recorded form. I know that, in the previous parliamentary session, the committee, in its previous incarnation, discussed the matter with witnesses. Just as body-worn video cameras can capture evidence that can be utilised efficiently, surely—and particularly after the pandemic—more can be done across the system to reduce the amount of time that different stakeholders are wasting by, in effect, hanging around.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
The lesson from the i6 project was that things should be done in stages, rather than by taking a big-bang approach, so to speak.
With regard to the estate, is Police Scotland thinking about its communications with communities? Earlier, the chief constable said that we are talking about an enhancement of the estate that will move it into the 21st century, while maintaining local presence and capability. Speaking from my constituents’ perspective—I know that it is the same elsewhere—the concern locally is that things are closing rather than changing and being enhanced. Consideration of the communications in that regard might be useful.
My last question is on revenue. DCC Connors, you talked about the importance of community policing and the difference that it can make in taking preventative action and creating flexibility. Can you say a bit more about what would be helpful financially in the period ahead in order to undertake preventative spend to a greater extent? What resources would make a meaningful difference in implementing the Christie principles in all the areas that the Parliament is considering with regard to public sector reform?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
We spoke earlier about the benefits that the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Act 2024 has realised. I was on the Education, Children and Young People Committee when that bill went through stages 1 and 2. One of the strong pieces of evidence that we heard at stage 1 was from your colleagues at Social Work Scotland, who talked about the challenge of resourcing implementation of that legislation. Is there anything that you want to say today about where we are with that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
That is really helpful on identifying the third sector and youth work services. I think of Circle Scotland, which is headquartered in Pilton in my constituency and serves all of the central belt, so I know about some of the challenges that organisations face in continuing to finance their important work. From what you have just said and what has been said earlier in the committee, is that an identifiable ask? If the third sector and youth work services could be identified for more spending, it would make a real impact.
11:30Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
Absolutely. Do any of the other witnesses want to say anything on those points?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
I will pick up on themes that others have raised. First, there are preventative spend considerations when it comes to prisons—both the capital costs of building them and the operational costs of having people in them. Will you say a bit more about the preventative spend and social prescribing through which community justice can provide savings in police time, national health service resource and local authority spend? A higher level of community justice can provide a wide benefit, can it not?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Ben Macpherson
Some important points have been made there, and I wonder whether it would be helpful for colleagues around the table to have clarity with an undertaking to engage with members from across the parties and with the stakeholders, as you listed earlier. It would be helpful to have reassurance that there will be further engagement on these matters as appropriate ahead of stage 3.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Ben Macpherson
The enforcement that we have just discussed through environmental health—and trading standards, I imagine—is extremely important. The increase in cases is clearly a concern for us all. As well as enforcement, is there work with partners that needs to be done, or is being done, to raise greater awareness of the issues in the public domain and help with the wider deterrence that clearly must be part of the response? As you have acknowledged, most of what is produced, procured and sold is done in good faith and at high standard, but in the examples where we have bad-faith actors, how do we raise more awareness and create more deterrence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Ben Macpherson
I am just checking that the roll-out of body-worn cameras will last if and when there is a change to the software that is used at national level. Are we procuring technology that is going to last and be cohesive and coherent?