The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1249 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I do not doubt that it can be done. I am just trying to get a sense, if the Parliament were to pass the bill, of a realistic time frame that will enable the practical delivery of something that, from everything that you have said, I am convinced would make a difference.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Communities need to be made aware of the PIRC, whether that is by parliamentarians such as ourselves, local authorities, the third sector or other statutory bodies.
Of course, an excellent website is welcome. I have constituents who are very aware of what you do or have been made aware by us. However, when told about the website, they have said, “Oh, I didn’t know about that”. That is just something to bear in mind.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I have a brief question. Mr Chapman, you mentioned that, of your casework, approximately 50 per cent comes from the west, 25 per cent from the north and 25 per cent from the east. I thought that that was interesting, given the population changes in Scotland and the places where the population is growing.
It provoked me to think about something that I have engaged with you on in the past. I appreciate your role in statute and in the timeline of a complaint. Will you be undertaking work in the period ahead—especially if the Parliament passes the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Bill this afternoon and it is then implemented—to raise awareness of the PIRC further in the public domain so that people know that you are there and you are able to hear cases?
Having helped constituents through the PIRC submission process, I sometimes worry about how much public awareness there is that the PIRC is there and that you can consider people’s cases.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Can I ask one more small question, convener?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
You are saying that we are getting closer but we do not know yet—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
David Hamilton mentioned that the Lanarkshire project saved 18,000 police man-hours. As a follow-up, ACC Paton, are you able to give the committee an indication of the number of man-hours that we might save if we make progress with the implementation of the collaborative commitments, and of what the financial gain might be? That would enable us to help with calls on the budget—potentially the big health budget—to support that work.
That question was as quick as I was able to make it, convener.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I thank the witnesses for being with us, and for their feedback and comments so far. I engaged with this issue initially as a constituency MSP in Edinburgh. However, I found that the evidence that we received from the SPF, for example, ahead of today’s session resonates with the challenges that have been experienced in the capital, in that—to quote from the SPF submission—
“this area of business is the single biggest inhibitor in operational officers across Scotland being able to carry out their core function to deliver basic policing services across our communities.”
That is a challenge with which we are all wrestling, although I recognise the increase in collaboration and perseverance, and the progress and the reduction in demand.
In that context, I have two questions. First, I am, and the committee is, aware of initiatives that are being implemented by the police such as mental health triage cars in Edinburgh and a community triage service in Lanarkshire. Are you aware of other initiatives that are examples of good practice in addressing the issues around the policing of vulnerable people? How could those be rolled out, if appropriate, on a national basis?
I turn to my second question. Dr Steel, you talked about how we create a door that accepts both, if that is an accurate way to quote your key message back to you. How far away are we from that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2024
Ben Macpherson
I am not a member of the Law Society of Scotland, but I am on its roll of Scottish solicitors. That may be of relevance at points during our deliberations.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2024
Ben Macpherson
Thank you very much, Murdo, for your assistance, and thank you, colleagues, for electing me—if that is an appropriate description—to the position of convener.
Item 3 is a decision on whether to take item 4 in private. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
10:03 Meeting continued in private until 10:50.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, minister, and to your officials. You have touched on this already, but I wonder whether you might say a bit more. In your opening statement, you said that amendments at stage 2 will be kept to an absolute minimum and, in response to a colleague, you said that they will be very technical in nature. For the benefit of the Parliament, even at this stage, and for those listening, will you say a bit more about the rationale behind that, and when the detail—some of which you relayed in a previous answer—will become clearer for those who are interested in the operation of the system?