Chamber and committees

I am not sure that the member was here throughout my statement, when I explained all the work that has gone on behind the scenes on the part of the cabinet secretary, officials and me. The cabinet secretary and I met legal representatives twice last week, as part of our regular engagement with the legal profession to try to resolve issues in good faith.

As I said in my statement, I have accepted all the Law Society’s proposals on the COP26 duty and the weekend custody courts. We continue to offer engagement and I have written back to the profession to clarify that and to ask for engagement to continue so that we can, I hope, reach a solution.

In our programme for government, we committed to engage with legal professionals and other stakeholders to review the legal aid system and introduce a legal aid reform bill in this parliamentary session to ensure that the system is flexible and easy to access and that it meets the needs of those who use it.

We consulted on that reform in 2019 and stated our willingness to take forward the recommendations that will deliver that enhanced system of legal aid in Scotland. We also stated our commitment to retain a demand-led fund, with the wide scope of action that we have at the moment.

Particular consideration will be given to how more targeted and planned interventions can support user need, align with the Government priorities that we identified and assist in legal aid being rightly recognised as an invaluable public service.

Thank you, convener, and good morning to the committee.

The Tribunals (Scotland) Act 2014 created a simplified statutory framework for tribunals in Scotland, bringing existing tribunal jurisdictions together and providing a structure for new jurisdictions.

The 2014 act created a new two-tier structure for tribunals in Scotland—a First-tier Tribunal for initial appeal decisions and an Upper Tribunal primarily for appeals from the First-tier Tribunal. The tribunals are known collectively as the Scottish tribunals.

Section 20(1) of the 2014 act provides that

“The First-tier Tribunal is to be organised into a number of chambers,”

having regard, among other things, to subject matter.

There are five existing chambers in the First-tier Tribunal. The regulation is a technical one that makes provision for a new sixth chamber, to be known as the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland local taxation chamber, which will hear appeals that are currently dealt with by valuation appeals committees and the council tax reduction review panel.

The regulations form part of a broader suite of instruments that will, in due course, be required to enable the transfer of the valuation appeals committees and the council tax reduction review panel to the First-tier Tribunal.

I understand that the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee considered the regulations on 5 October and that it did not raise any points, but I would be happy to answer any questions that the committee may have.

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I would have voted no.

Jamie Greene is right to point that out. There are three options in the consultation; two of them exempt sleeping premises. That covers care homes, which the member rightly mentioned, along with hospitals, prisons and so on.

A reduction in unwanted fire alarm signals could release significant resources that could be deployed to more productive and beneficial tasks, including prevention and fire safety work. Although the SFRS remains committed to driving down the number of unwanted fire alarms, it will always respond to alarm signals immediately, with appropriate resources, if fire is confirmed or if signs of fire are reported.

It is worth noting that, as I said, two of the options that are set out in the consultation exempt premises such as care homes and hospitals from being call challenged, which means that an immediate response will be sent to investigate a call and the cause of the alarm. Any potential change in the response to such premises will be discussed thoroughly before any final decision is made on the way forward.

We are committed to modernising the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service so that it can do more to keep communities safe and contribute to better outcomes for the people of Scotland. That has been demonstrated though our continued investment in the SFRS, with a further uplift of £8.7 million in resource for 2021-22, which brings the total budget to £343 million. We are consulting on our fire and rescue framework for Scotland. Modernisation is at the heart of our priorities and objectives for the SFRS.

I welcome the consultation by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service. Addressing unwanted fire alarm signals is a priority in the fire and rescue framework for Scotland. Unwanted fire alarm signals are an issue for fire services throughout the United Kingdom. They place the public and firefighters at risk by causing unnecessary blue-light journeys and diverting resources away from genuine emergencies. The consultation seeks to understand stakeholders’ views on the options that it puts forward. I would expect there to be further SFRS engagement to explore any significant concerns that are raised, before a final decision is made on the way forward.

Good morning. I thank the committee for asking me to speak to the regulations.

The purpose of the instrument is to support implementation and commencement of the Age of Criminal Responsibility (Scotland) Act 2019, which provides for orders in relation to children to allow investigation of their actions, notwithstanding that they will not have committed offences.

The orders, when they are granted, will largely permit the sort of interventions that the police would otherwise be able to make in respect of suspects, including searches, interviews and taking of prints and samples. The interventions will enable the police to determine what has happened so that the right support can be put in place for a child whose behaviour has caused harm, as well as for the person who was harmed by that behaviour.

The legal aid provisions are to allow for representation in respect of applications for the orders, in order to ensure that the rights of children—and others, in some cases—are protected in the course of proceedings.

That is a brief overview of the regulations. I am, of course, happy to answer any questions that the committee has.

The draft order confers various legal immunities and privileges on the conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—COP26—and specified participants.

COP26 is considered to be the most significant climate change event since the 2015 Paris agreement. It is the biggest summit that the United Kingdom has ever hosted and it is a huge honour to welcome the conference to Scotland.

To enable COP26 to fulfil its purpose and take place successfully, it has been agreed that certain privileges and immunities require to be granted to certain attendees. A host country agreement, negotiated between the UK Government and the UNFCCC secretariat, regulates the privileges and immunities that are to be afforded to certain COP26 attendees—for example, certain tax exemptions and immunity from legal process. The agreement obliges the UK to abide by the terms of the protocol on privileges and immunities.

The draft order gives effect to those agreed obligations in so far as they relate to devolved matters in Scotland. Equivalent provision in respect of host country agreement obligations for reserved matters and devolved matters in the rest of the UK is being made by order in council at Westminster. However, to the extent that the privileges and immunities relate to devolved matters, the issue rightly falls to the Scottish Parliament. Subject to parliamentary consideration in this Parliament and at Westminster, both orders in council will be signed.

To assist the committee, I will say a little about the nature of the privileges and immunities. The draft order provides that the representatives of parties to the UNFCCC, the Kyoto protocol and the Paris agreement, the representatives of observer states and the officials of the specialised agencies of the UN will have immunity from suit and legal process. Those immunities cover things done or omitted to be done only while they are exercising their official functions in connection with the Glasgow conference and during their journeys to and from conference premises. The order also provides for the inviolability of any private residence used by representatives during COP26, as well as exemptions and privileges in respect of personal baggage and exemption or relief from all devolved and local taxes.

Importantly, the draft order permits that immunity can be expressly waived by an appropriate party or state. It also provides limited immunity from suit and legal process for representatives of the clean development mechanism executive board. That immunity is conferred only while the executive board exercises its official functions as part of the conference and can be waived by the secretary general of the UN.

It is customary for a sovereign state to grant such privileges and immunities to diplomatic missions and international organisations, to enable them to function. The host country agreement between the UK and the UN on COP26 is broadly in line with that global practice and includes provisions to ensure that immunities and privileges do not impede the proper administration of justice. It is important to emphasise that immunity does not provide carte blanche for ignoring the laws and regulations of the host country. The privileges and immunities that will be conferred by the order are granted primarily on the basis of strict functional need, and it has been agreed by the UK and the UN that they are of no greater an extent than is required to enable COP26 and the specified individuals connected with it to function effectively.

The immunities and privileges are limited in that they apply only to official functions that are undertaken in connection with the Glasgow conference, they can be waived and they do not give an individual freedom to commit criminal activity. The immunity is similar to but more limited than that which has, for generations, been conferred on diplomats working in foreign jurisdictions. As with diplomatic immunity, all individuals who benefit from such privileges and immunities in Scotland are expected to respect Scots law, both criminal and civil.

The order will implement the agreement that the UK has reached with the UNFCCC secretariat in line with global practice. It will enable COP26 to be held in Glasgow and the conduct of associated activities in the UK, while ensuring and upholding protections for the effective administration of justice. As a good global citizen, the Scottish Government has a responsibility to bring the draft order to the Parliament.

I thank Pauline McNeill for noting that change. That specific carve out has been agreed for the draft order.