Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 795 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Single-sex Spaces (Public Sector)

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Ash Regan

I admire their spirit in trying to come up with a compromise that works for everyone, but they should not have to do that themselves. Leadership should be exercised in those areas.

On single-sex changing spaces, women have an internationally protected right to privacy, bodily integrity and protection against sexual violence. The position that has been taken by the Scottish Government and local authorities in relation to single-sex changing spaces runs counter to the protections that are outlined under international law.

The Scottish Government is responsible for human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998, even though it likes to pretend that it is not. The Scottish Parliament retains competence with regard to observing and implementing international human rights obligations. Again, I do not think that the Parliament is taking that up in the way that it should. In my opinion, both the Government and the Parliament are failing to uphold women’s human rights in Scotland.

That brings me neatly on to the Scottish Human Rights Commission. When I questioned the chair of the commission two weeks ago, she was unable to answer any of my simple questions to my satisfaction or—I think—to the public’s satisfaction. So, the commission is also failing: it is failing to adhere to the remit that is set out in its enabling legislation. It did not provide a comprehensive analysis of women and girls as vulnerable rights holders during the passage of the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, which is a serious failure. It continues to fail to make interventions on upholding women’s human rights. The Parliament must now act, either to remove the commissioner, to censure the commission or to end its funding. I look forward to speaking to other members about what they think of that suggestion.

Meeting of the Parliament

Single-sex Spaces (Public Sector)

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Ash Regan

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I seek your guidance. Is it not customary and does it not reflect extremely good practice for the minister who is summing up to engage with the substance of the debate? [Applause.]

Meeting of the Parliament

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 6 March 2025

Ash Regan

Despite the First Minister’s warm words during the answer to the question, I feel that he is woefully out of touch on the situation of women’s rights across Scotland. Therefore, it is utterly impossible to accelerate action towards gender equality when women’s human rights are under attack.

The Scottish Government must now apologise for its role in that and break from those state-sanctioned abuses. Will the First Minister make a clear commitment today to uphold the internationally protected human rights of women and girls in Scotland?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

My question is not about the individual case—it is about the wider issues.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

Forgive me for interrupting, but I have set out a number of issues. There are many people across Scotland who genuinely feel that women’s human rights are under attack right now across several of those issues, and across other issues that I have not set out. However, I genuinely feel that I am not hearing from the commission on either side of those issues. One way or another, we are not hearing from you, and you are not making interventions on those matters. Do you agree?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

Yes. Professor O’Hagan, you have set out that there are different scrutiny mechanisms that work together and through which you are accountable. Can you suggest any ways in which your accountability could be improved or other areas that you think could be made more robust?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

And the Istanbul convention is within your remit.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

The committee has a strong interest in accountability and scrutiny. Will you say a bit about how that is working? Do you think that it is effective? Are you being held to account in a robust manner?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

That is helpful. Thanks for putting that on the record.

We will need to be brief, because we are running out of time, but are there areas in which scrutiny could be improved or in which the Parliament or the SPCB needs to do better? Feel free to say whatever you like.