Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 764 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Single-sex Spaces (Public Sector)

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Ash Regan

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I seek your guidance. Is it not customary and does it not reflect extremely good practice for the minister who is summing up to engage with the substance of the debate? [Applause.]

Meeting of the Parliament

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 6 March 2025

Ash Regan

Despite the First Minister’s warm words during the answer to the question, I feel that he is woefully out of touch on the situation of women’s rights across Scotland. Therefore, it is utterly impossible to accelerate action towards gender equality when women’s human rights are under attack.

The Scottish Government must now apologise for its role in that and break from those state-sanctioned abuses. Will the First Minister make a clear commitment today to uphold the internationally protected human rights of women and girls in Scotland?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

My question is not about the individual case—it is about the wider issues.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

Forgive me for interrupting, but I have set out a number of issues. There are many people across Scotland who genuinely feel that women’s human rights are under attack right now across several of those issues, and across other issues that I have not set out. However, I genuinely feel that I am not hearing from the commission on either side of those issues. One way or another, we are not hearing from you, and you are not making interventions on those matters. Do you agree?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

Yes. Professor O’Hagan, you have set out that there are different scrutiny mechanisms that work together and through which you are accountable. Can you suggest any ways in which your accountability could be improved or other areas that you think could be made more robust?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

And the Istanbul convention is within your remit.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

The committee has a strong interest in accountability and scrutiny. Will you say a bit about how that is working? Do you think that it is effective? Are you being held to account in a robust manner?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

That is helpful. Thanks for putting that on the record.

We will need to be brief, because we are running out of time, but are there areas in which scrutiny could be improved or in which the Parliament or the SPCB needs to do better? Feel free to say whatever you like.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Ash Regan

Good morning. The committee is interested in the ideas of accountability and scrutiny, and whether you think that those are robust. The Scottish Human Rights Commission was set up by the Parliament to uphold human rights and to ensure that policy meets human rights requirements.

Last week, the EHRC intervened in the wake of the case involving Sandie Peggie and NHS Fife, but I note that we have not heard from you on that case or on single-sex spaces, nor have we heard from you on toilets in schools, the British Transport Police’s intimate search policy or Police Scotland’s policies on sex and gender. I argue that women’s human rights are very much affected by those issues. How, therefore, are you accountable to the Parliament and to the people of Scotland if you are failing to uphold the standards that provide the very reason for your existence?