The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 764 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Ash Regan
To ask the Scottish Government whether its policy position in relation to an independent Scotland seeking to rejoin the European Union includes rejoining the common fisheries policy. (S6O-04519)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Ash Regan
Norway, which is a country that is similar in size to Scotland, is a member of the European Free Trade Association, which gives it access to the European Economic Area. Norway thrives outside of the EU but inside the single market through controlling its own waters, managing its own resources and delivering prosperity for its people. Does the Scottish Government accept that Norway offers a viable model of European trade for an independent Scotland? What concrete steps is the Government taking to ensure that Scotland regains access to the single market?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Ash Regan
A culture of disrespect and violence is clearly developing across society—there is almost a dehumanisation of women and girls—so it is no surprise that we are seeing that more and more in our schools. It is clear that some of the Government’s policies and choices, both in wider society and in school grounds, are contributing negatively to promoting that negative culture. Will the Government realise its role and work towards improving the culture so that it upholds women’s boundaries and promotes respect for women and girls?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Ash Regan
I extend the deep condolences of all in the Alba Party to the friends and family of Christina McKelvie at this very sad time.
To ask the First Minister, in light of reports of an escalation in gang-related violence in Edinburgh, with recent shootings in Niddrie and West Pilton, what immediate action can be taken to support the emergency services in ensuring the safety and reassurance of communities in the Edinburgh Eastern constituency. (S6F-03970)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Ash Regan
The very serious concerns that were raised at the Scottish Police Federation conference over issues such as officer burnout and underresourcing leading to reactive policing must be urgently addressed to support our police, who, in turn, support our communities’ safety. Edinburgh residents have the right to reassurance from visible, proactive policing and the right to not be left at the risk of being caught up in gang warfare. Will the First Minister commit today to reviewing the allocation formula for police funding for Edinburgh and consider targeted support for policing in areas of rising gang activity?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ash Regan
Yes.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ash Regan
Capacity is certainly one of the issues that we are facing.
My other question is about measuring the performance of the commissions. If it is felt that a commission is not complying with its remit and it looks as if the Parliament either has failed to understand that looking at that is part of its duties or has not held the commission to account or censured it, is that a failure of the parliamentarians or the Parliament, or does the failure lie in the way that the system was conceived or set up?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ash Regan
Yes.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ash Regan
This has been an interesting discussion so far.
The committee rightly has a strong interest in how the accountability and scrutiny mechanisms are, or are not, working, depending on how people see that.
My first question is for Dr Elliott. Your written submission identified a number of additional reforms, including ideas such as having new funding models and linking back to the outcomes that we are seeking to achieve. Please expand a little on your thinking.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Ash Regan
That is useful.
Dr Lamont, the committee has already had a few discussions about annual reporting, where that is working and where it is not working, and there is a suggestion that the SPCB has the power to determine the contents of annual reports. What are your thoughts on that? Are those reports meaningful enough? Is the information in them actionable enough for the parliamentary committees?
11:00