Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 954 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

If he would not mind letting me finish this point.

That required difficult decisions to be made, but there is no doubt about the overarching impact of the budget. There is a massive injection of funding to our public services, including £5.2 billion for Scotland alone. That is the very real difference that a Labour Government can make. That is a real start; it is not the end point, but a start on alleviating the damage that was caused by the past 14 years of UK Government.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

To ask the Scottish Government how it will work with the United Kingdom Government on the recently announced £200 million investment in Grangemouth, as part of the national wealth fund. (S6T-02380)

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

If he wants to correct my numbers, they are right here. Resource funding is real: last year, it was £46.9 billion and this year it is £49.8 billion. I have done the maths. Maybe my calculator is wrong, Mr Gibson—feel free to come back, but those are the numbers that I am basing that on.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

We had 14 years of Tory decline, 14 years of dismantling public services and 14 years of chaos and incompetence. That is what that budget set out to address.

The cabinet secretary says that to will the ends, we must will the means. However, what did her colleagues do? Did they vote to end those 14 years of decline? Did they vote for the record increase in funding? Did they vote for those things? Did any of them vote for it? It was not nine of them that voted for it—it was none. Frankly, that argument has absolutely no coherence whatsoever.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

We cannot support the record of this Government.

We need reform—[Interruption.] We need Scots to have public services that serve their interests—[Interruption.]

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

Thank you very much, Presiding Officer. I am grateful. I know that it is hard for members to have respect for what I am saying, but clearly I am getting them very excited.

Critically, if the SNP’s argument had any credibility, it would have come forward with alternatives to the measures set out in the UK Labour Government’s budget, but it has offered none. We have not heard a word about what it might do. We certainly have not heard SNP members repeat the First Minister’s claim that we should equalise tax rates, because we know that that would lead to £636 million being lost from the Scottish budget. Neither have we heard them repeat their claims, which they made during the general election campaign, that we should borrow more. I do not think that anyone could credibly claim that they are doing that.

Frankly, the SNP is out of credibility on the budget, because it simply has no alternatives—it has nothing to say. The budget is an important step. It will see increases in the revenue that is available to our public services, thanks to that £5.2 billion in the block grant.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

Will the member give way?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

No. Let us be clear. There were issues that were known about. However, as the correspondence between the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Government made clear, the full extent of that £22 billion black hole was not clear. It had not been laid bare. It was a black hole that needed to be addressed. [Interruption.]

For anyone to come to this place and talk credibly about the budget, they need to answer how that £22 billion black hole would be addressed. Let us be clear—[Interruption.]

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

Our position on the budget is clear. This is such a big issue that I do not think that the workers at Grangemouth would thank us for playing politics with it. [Interruption.] It is an important point.

Of all the numbers of great importance, the most important is that 400 people have been given redundancy notices. Given that this is the start of the hard work to attract investment in, which is what the funds are expected to do, what steps will the Scottish Government take alongside the United Kingdom Government to attract that investment? Critically, will those sums be available to fund project willow?

Meeting of the Parliament

Great British Energy Bill

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Daniel Johnson

I do not need to talk to them in London. I talk to them here, because they are up here regularly. I was talking to Michael Shanks just this morning, and I will be talking to colleagues over the weekend. I talk to Ian Murray regularly. Believe you me—Scottish Labour wants to get this done, as do our UK Government colleagues. If members want to see a plan, let us get on with establishing GB Energy.

I understand members’ frustrations. We live in difficult times, and we want to see as much investment as possible flow through GB Energy. If that frustration is tempered, it is by the appalling legacy that the previous UK Government has been left by the Westminster counterparts of the Scottish Tories sitting across the way in the chamber. That is the reality. I understand the frustrations of the legislative process, but let us be clear about getting on with the transition and backing GB Energy.

17:07