The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 954 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
If he would not mind letting me finish this point.
That required difficult decisions to be made, but there is no doubt about the overarching impact of the budget. There is a massive injection of funding to our public services, including £5.2 billion for Scotland alone. That is the very real difference that a Labour Government can make. That is a real start; it is not the end point, but a start on alleviating the damage that was caused by the past 14 years of UK Government.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
To ask the Scottish Government how it will work with the United Kingdom Government on the recently announced £200 million investment in Grangemouth, as part of the national wealth fund. (S6T-02380)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
If he wants to correct my numbers, they are right here. Resource funding is real: last year, it was £46.9 billion and this year it is £49.8 billion. I have done the maths. Maybe my calculator is wrong, Mr Gibson—feel free to come back, but those are the numbers that I am basing that on.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
We had 14 years of Tory decline, 14 years of dismantling public services and 14 years of chaos and incompetence. That is what that budget set out to address.
The cabinet secretary says that to will the ends, we must will the means. However, what did her colleagues do? Did they vote to end those 14 years of decline? Did they vote for the record increase in funding? Did they vote for those things? Did any of them vote for it? It was not nine of them that voted for it—it was none. Frankly, that argument has absolutely no coherence whatsoever.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
We cannot support the record of this Government.
We need reform—[Interruption.] We need Scots to have public services that serve their interests—[Interruption.]
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you very much, Presiding Officer. I am grateful. I know that it is hard for members to have respect for what I am saying, but clearly I am getting them very excited.
Critically, if the SNP’s argument had any credibility, it would have come forward with alternatives to the measures set out in the UK Labour Government’s budget, but it has offered none. We have not heard a word about what it might do. We certainly have not heard SNP members repeat the First Minister’s claim that we should equalise tax rates, because we know that that would lead to £636 million being lost from the Scottish budget. Neither have we heard them repeat their claims, which they made during the general election campaign, that we should borrow more. I do not think that anyone could credibly claim that they are doing that.
Frankly, the SNP is out of credibility on the budget, because it simply has no alternatives—it has nothing to say. The budget is an important step. It will see increases in the revenue that is available to our public services, thanks to that £5.2 billion in the block grant.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
Will the member give way?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
No. Let us be clear. There were issues that were known about. However, as the correspondence between the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Government made clear, the full extent of that £22 billion black hole was not clear. It had not been laid bare. It was a black hole that needed to be addressed. [Interruption.]
For anyone to come to this place and talk credibly about the budget, they need to answer how that £22 billion black hole would be addressed. Let us be clear—[Interruption.]
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
Our position on the budget is clear. This is such a big issue that I do not think that the workers at Grangemouth would thank us for playing politics with it. [Interruption.] It is an important point.
Of all the numbers of great importance, the most important is that 400 people have been given redundancy notices. Given that this is the start of the hard work to attract investment in, which is what the funds are expected to do, what steps will the Scottish Government take alongside the United Kingdom Government to attract that investment? Critically, will those sums be available to fund project willow?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
I do not need to talk to them in London. I talk to them here, because they are up here regularly. I was talking to Michael Shanks just this morning, and I will be talking to colleagues over the weekend. I talk to Ian Murray regularly. Believe you me—Scottish Labour wants to get this done, as do our UK Government colleagues. If members want to see a plan, let us get on with establishing GB Energy.
I understand members’ frustrations. We live in difficult times, and we want to see as much investment as possible flow through GB Energy. If that frustration is tempered, it is by the appalling legacy that the previous UK Government has been left by the Westminster counterparts of the Scottish Tories sitting across the way in the chamber. That is the reality. I understand the frustrations of the legislative process, but let us be clear about getting on with the transition and backing GB Energy.
17:07