The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1645 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
I wonder whether Bob Doris would agree with me on this. There are two points here: one is the principle, and one concerns the technical drafting. On the principle, as he has pointed out, the policy memorandum seems to suggest that the bill is about providing a possibility for people for whom death is very near or imminent. That is different from the technicalities of how we capture that. However, it is important to establish whether we want to capture that immediacy in the bill itself or leave it to further regulation and guidance. Does the member agree with me that, even if the committee rejects the technicalities of what has been drafted, we need some understanding of whether members accept the principle?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
I think that the member might be referring to my amendments in a later group, which would alter the age to 25. I hear what he is saying, but I wonder whether he thinks that there is a discussion to be had about the issue. He talks about rights but, earlier in his contribution, he talked about capacity, too. There is an increasing body of evidence on cognitive development and neurodevelopment that shows that people’s attitudes and ability to make decisions—that is, their cognitive ability—do not fully mature until the age of 25. If capacity is a central issue, there is at least a discussion to be had about the age limit to be set, because we absolutely want to ensure that people are exercising this right with the fullest of capacity. Does the member accept that those are the parameters of this debate?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
My intervention is further to that point. I echo the questions that Bob Doris just raised and will add to them. As it stands, from the member’s understanding, what would prevent someone with a decade or more to live from exercising their rights under the bill? That question follows on from the very powerful point that Pam Duncan-Glancy made.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Daniel Johnson
Bob was first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
In your annual report last year, you stated that one of your primary risks relates to stability of funding from the Scottish Government. Given that you will produce your annual report a matter of weeks before the Scottish Government will introduce its budget, how is the Scottish Government supposed to set its budget with confidence if it does not know how you have estimated your performance in the previous financial year?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
Mr Wilson, you stated that your key focus is on outcomes for consumers in Scotland. Consumer Scotland’s statutory aims are to reduce harm to consumers, to increase consumer confidence, to increase the extent to which consumer matters are taken into account by public bodies, to promote sustainable practices in the use of goods by consumers and to otherwise advance wellbeing. There is a heavy emphasis on consumers, but how do you measure those outcomes? In your annual report last year, there is an awful lot of articulation of outputs but not necessarily any measures of outcomes for consumers.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
At this point, I will hand over to Gordon MacDonald.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
That is how you assess your output. Again, what I have to go off is last year’s annual report rather than this year’s report. On page 15, you outline some of your publications and outputs. It states that you produced only 34 publications, which is just more than one publication per employee in your organisation. Of those publications, nine were press releases and two were blog posts. The figures for your website interactions show just under 19,000 total views, and between 3,000 and 4,000 unique users, with an average engagement time of two minutes. You are judging yourself on your influence. Even if that concerns your influence on other organisations, not even 4,000 people in Scotland are using your information. Is that a sign of success, and will this year’s annual report show substantial improvement on those figures?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
Can I briefly follow up? You have had an increase in staff of almost 50 per cent. Has the value of your grants to external organisations increased by 50 per cent?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have two or three supplementary questions. We do not have the annual report in front of us, but I have quickly jotted down the numbers that we were provided with. Could you clarify your annual income? I see £2.4 million coming from the Scottish Government and the levy bringing in somewhere north of £4.5 million a year. What is the actual figure?