The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1001 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
Can you elaborate on that and give some examples of the sort of bureaucracy that you had to go through? What was the source? Did it come from the UK Government or the Scottish Government? I understand your point about volume, but did it make sense or was it a frustration?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
That is a really useful elaboration of the difference.
I will put the question to colleagues from Glasgow in a slightly different way. In many ways, Glasgow is much further forward on the journey to having a coherent approach to regional governance, with the Glasgow city region. Do you consider lessons that have been learned from the city region? Is exploring that critical to delivering on the opportunities? I direct those questions primarily to Owen O’Donnell, because I think that some of the fears, as it were, about such an approach come from smaller authorities, so I am particularly interested in hearing his views.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. Convener, I think that we are running out of time, so I will leave it there.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
I am going to put a different spin on it for our colleagues from Glasgow.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
I am interested in how city region deals sit within a broader policy framework. I will probably keep this to two questions, but I will put a slightly different spin on them for different respondents.
In a previous answer, Paul Lawrence alluded to the fact that city region deals were in some ways designed for combined authorities south of the border, and it has been suggested that some of the issues that have been encountered may be due to that. Will you elaborate a little on that? What issues have been encountered? Are there things that could be altered to make the deals more compatible with Scotland, or is it actually the other way round? Should we recognise that combined authorities afford possibilities that we cannot access because we do not have that structure?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
Thank you, convener. I would like to make a declaration of interests. With regard to agenda item 2, I ask the committee to note that the University of Edinburgh sports ground is in my constituency. With regard to agenda item 6, which we will discuss in private, I am a Scottish Labour and Co-operative Party MSP, and I am also a member of two trade unions: the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers—USDAW—and Community, both of which contributed to my election campaigns in 2016 and 2021. Information on that is available to see in my submissions to the Electoral Commission.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I will focus my questions on the overall function and purpose of the growth deals, and whether those elements are clear. In a sense, this follows on from the point that was unearthed regarding the cluttered landscape.
Do you feel that there is clarity around what each of the growth deals seeks to achieve? Are those aspects well defined and compatible with one another, and are they always compatible with national policy and objectives? Perhaps colleagues from Audit Scotland can begin.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I want to circle back to how the level was arrived at and the evidence. I very much appreciate the insight about the lack of data, but I have always been taught to be suspicious of round numbers. Although £1,000 is a nice round number, £750 seems like a very nice round number. I appreciate that there is a lack of data, but what methodology was used to arrive at £750 or was that just a judgment? The flipside of the question is: what would have been the consequence or potential cost of going with £1,000 rather than £750?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
Are you confident that the projects within deals are compatible with one another? Sometimes one looks at these deals and everything looks great, but what end are the projects all driving at, and are they all consistent, even within growth deals? Are you confident that that is the case?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I see that Neil McInroy is nodding away, or at least gesticulating. Neil, what are your thoughts on those points?