The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 764 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
It is not about granular detail; it is about a broad sense of what the priorities are, what we are aiming towards and over what timeframe that will be achieved. That would be helpful, and I have shared that point directly with Graeme Dey.
I think that one of the real priorities is upskilling and reskilling. We have an ageing workforce. Because of demographics, we now have almost an inverse pyramid, so essentially we have to focus on older people. However, we still have a focus on skills being about young people leaving school. We have explicit funding thresholds based on age and a focus on apprenticeships, but older workers might not need to do a whole new apprenticeship and, even if they do, people cannot do more than one apprenticeship in their career. Are we missing that part of the agenda?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have a couple of questions about pace and focus but, before that, I want to follow on from Willie Coffey’s question. You are right about the importance of colleges, and you posed a question about focus and what we are measuring. A fear has been articulated to me that we are measuring colleges on their ability to produce university graduates. As part of the culture shift, do we need to question that and think about whether colleges are producing vocational qualifications, and perhaps revisit the move away from part-time courses at colleges?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thanks very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
What is preventing that from happening? Is it just the college funding model aspects that we have rehearsed and which I get? How do we deliver that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
It sounds as though you are saying that we should claw back the college funding mechanism, which is based on credits—I will not go down that rabbit hole with the committee this morning—and use a model that seeks to leverage private sector investment. That would require redirecting the money that is put into the college credit system. Is that what you are advocating?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
That is a big uncertainty when running an organisation, is it not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will move on to my questions on scale and pace, which in a sense follow on from what Jamie Halcro Johnston asked about. You said that, a year ago, you were a bit frustrated, but we now have the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill. To reflect on the process a little, it is two years since you reported and three years since you were asked to do the review, and it all stemmed from an Audit Scotland report in 2021. Therefore, we will probably be five years on from that report before we see legislation being enacted and progressing, and it is only on the structure. Are you confident that we are moving at sufficient pace to deliver change?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am amused by that last comment, given some of our discussions about whether we should call them SCQF qualifications or highers. It is a good point.
I want to take you back to your proposal that we merge the funding streams, so that the funding is all in one place, to stop the either/or. We all understand the logic, but is there not a danger that we have been down that path before? The Scottish Funding Council was created through a merger of the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council and the Scottish Further Education Funding Council, yet, when we look at how the funding streams work, that merger did not produce the integration that was hoped for. Is there not a danger that we are pursuing structural change that will not actually deliver that? That way of doing things has been tried before and it did not work.