The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1632 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
There will be a division.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
I will speak to amendment 27 and the other amendments that I have lodged in the group. As Murdo Fraser has pointed out, amendment 27 is in a similar ball park to his amendment 17. As we discussed at stage 1, the bill does little more than require the compilation of plans in consultation with others. There was a concern that, without any additional steps or amendments, all that was consequent would not be possible and that, to make sure of progress, we needed to look at steps that could be brought in. There was an interesting interaction between the minister and some members of the committee during our stage 1 evidence taking and in the stage 1 debate about the tension that exists between the bill, and the importance of ensuring that community wealth building is approached from the bottom up and does not involve centrally imposed targets.
My amendments seek to set out a framework so that there is at least a consistent methodology in measuring the same or similar things across different community wealth building plans. Those plans could then choose their targets. Essentially, there would be a consistent measurement framework, but local target setting would be maintained nonetheless.
That is the balance that my amendment 27 seeks to strike. If it is—to use Murdo Fraser’s words—“overly prescriptive”, that is purely because I think that it is important that there is a consistent set of measures. I was seeking to specify a set of areas that we would want to be monitored consistently wherever community wealth building approaches are developed.
My other amendments in the group are consequential to amendment 27. Amendment 28 would enable parliamentary scrutiny of those measures to be undertaken, and amendment 29 would require ministers to publish some sort of report. It represents an attempt to consolidate the process and to provide some sort of analysis.
I suspect that the minister might suggest that one year is too short a reporting period. I am pretty relaxed about that. Likewise, I am open to considering what matters should be measured. I would not want my amendments to be dismissed for reasons to do with the length of the reporting period or what should be measured. I think that it would be useful to discuss the general principle of having a broad measurement framework within which the authors of community wealth building plans could set their own targets. That would be followed by a consolidated survey to look at how those community wealth building plans were progressing.
That is the central thrust of my amendments, which is very much in line with the approach that Murdo Fraser is proposing and, more broadly, with some of the discussion that has taken place in the committee and beyond. With that, I will close my comments on my amendments.
I invite the minister to speak to amendment 101 and other amendments in the group.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
The question is, that amendment 25 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
Oh, we are not agreed. Apologies. Not only do I need to sort out my diction, but I need to wash out my ears.
There will be a division.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
There will be a division.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 91 disagreed to.
Amendment 129 moved—[Paul Sweeney].
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
Further to that, it is interesting that the minister mentioned the Deputy First Minister’s work on investment and so on, and he rightly mentioned fiduciary duties. Ultimately, the first duty of the trustees will be to ensure that the interests of the scheme members are overseen. However, that does not stop the Scottish Government from, essentially, trying to encourage and present investment opportunities in Scotland, which may well be absolutely the sort of thing that would be in the interest of scheme members, but would also represent the interest of local communities in community wealth building.
Could such a thought be included in future investment summits or in approaches using an investment summit model to encourage the maximum investment of our pension funds in our local communities?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
The question is, that amendment 62 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
There will be a division.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 63 disagreed to.
Amendment 64 moved—[Richard Leonard].