The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 989 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
That is not the point that I was making.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
Will the member take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
I listened carefully to the member’s answer to Graham Simpson. He seemed to say that there is no difference between the 2004 act and this bill in relation to evidence. However, there is a major difference in that people would have had a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. I appreciate that we do not wish to have that requirement in the future, but does that not mean that the evidence that will remain will be a bit arbitrary and subjective? How will we prove that there has been a fraudulent inquiry if we are talking about how people feel?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
It might just be because it is late in the day, but Mr Whittle is surely not suggesting that he is the first person to draw attention to these issues.
21:45Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Rather reluctantly, given what has happened over the past hour, I seek your guidance on scope. Colleagues from across the chamber have had amendments ruled out of scope for the reason that the bill relates to the process of applying for a gender recognition certificate, not to the effect of having a gender recognition certificate. That has left some of us unable to address concerns that constituents have raised, in particular in relation to the fact that the bill, if passed, will allow a much larger cohort of citizens to change their legal sex.
In raising this point of order, I wish to make it clear that I am not challenging your rulings on any individual rejected amendments. Rather, I am asking you to provide clarity, on the record, as to scope, so that members and our constituents who are watching can be very clear about the parameters for our consideration of the bill at this time.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
Not moved.
Amendment 46 moved—[Sue Webber].
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
Will the cabinet secretary respond to my point that those processes are available at the end, rather than at the beginning, of the GRC application and will she comment on what safeguards are available at the beginning of the process?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
Yes, I agree with that.
Early assessment would prevent the person from getting a GRC and then others having to intervene at a later stage. I believe that going through the process and then having it challenged at the end would be far more difficult and challenging for the adult concerned. I want to be clear that this in no way suggests that everyone with communication difficulties or a learning disability lacks capacity, and I repeat that it is important that incapacity is not seen as a blanket judgment and, rather, that it is decision specific.
The amendments would benefit applicants who are incapable of understanding by reducing the risk that they are put through complex and stressful legal processes that could have been avoided if more care was taken earlier to avoid a GRC being issued to anyone who is incapable of understanding its effect.
I move amendment 34.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
I am pleased to have placed on record my concerns about adults with incapacity. Based on what the cabinet secretary has said, particularly about the importance of support and inclusive communication, I will not press my amendments.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2022
Ruth Maguire
I will speak to my amendments 35, 38 and 43 to 45, and in doing so I am thinking of victims of men’s violence—women in all their diversity. I will mention Anne, who wrote to me along with the other females who offered to share their experiences with the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee in order to explain the importance of single-sex spaces. Those spaces were important for their emotional and therapeutic needs as they recovered from the abuse that was exacted on them by men. I am heart sorry that the narrow scope of the bill has meant that the important impact of opening the process to a wider cohort has not been given as full an airing in our Scottish Parliament as it should have.
The purpose of my amendments is to prevent a person with a history of domestic abuse from obtaining a GRC without undergoing further scrutiny before a GRC is granted and to ensure that GRC holders cannot take advantage of a change of identity to evade checks for domestic abuse made under the disclosure scheme, by requiring a specific check on whether a person has a history of domestic abuse before they are granted a GRC, and, if the application is granted, notifying Police Scotland. That would be achieved by requiring a specific check on the person’s history. If they had such a history, the registrar general would take further advice on whether to accept the application, with regulations to set out how that would be done and permitting the involvement of such external input as was deemed appropriate.
Domestic abuse is widely understood to include manipulative and coercive behaviour. These amendments are about perpetrators of that crime.
21:45