The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 895 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Fulton MacGregor
I agree with that. There is perhaps some overlap in that with work that is done by the Education, Children and Young People Committee. Craig Naylor, do you want to add anything?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Fulton MacGregor
I remember the bill in the previous parliamentary session. As I said, I was on the committee and there was a lot of talk that the bill, while bringing in a new offence, was also trying to change the culture around the issue. I remember members from all parties speaking about that in the debates. Are we changing the culture? Are we on the right track?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Fulton MacGregor
I thank the minister for the letter. It is a bit of a mixed bag. We have heard a more critical view so far, but what is in the first two bullet points, to which Russell Findlay referred, is good. It is reassuring that some of the provisions will come in before bonfire night, which is obviously the season that is being targeted. The commencement of the pyrotechnic possession offence is also a positive.
With regard to the last two points, however, I find myself agreeing with colleagues who have already spoken. What is set out is a bit watery. On the licensing system, which is a key part of the legislation, the letter says:
“it will commence mid-2024 at the earliest”.
I would rather that we were working towards mid-2024 for definite, albeit that there could be mitigating circumstances.
On the final point, I do not think that it is good enough to say that implementation could be delayed until “a future ... year”. We need something a wee bit more definitive.
The letter is a mixed bag. Given the work that all members of the committee put into the legislation, it is good to see that some of it is coming forward, and we hope that it will make a difference to our constituents. However, there are areas that need to be tightened up, so we will need to write back to the minister on those.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Fulton MacGregor
Thanks, convener. I am a member of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee that Rona Mackay referred to. Yesterday, the committee again considered the petition that she referred to and has agreed to do some further work around the area. Was the review team aware of that petition and, if so, did it take it into consideration?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Fulton MacGregor
It was a while ago, was it not?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Fulton MacGregor
No, that is fine—I just thought that I would ask.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Fulton MacGregor
I agree with what Karen Adam and Maggie Chapman have said. At this point, I think that, ultimately, we need to close the petition, but we need to keep Sandra Docherty involved in that loop and let her know exactly what we are thinking about—that there is more work to be done. That would be ideal. It would give us time to develop what that work might look like, get feedback on that from Sandra and other stakeholders, and then progress it.
Like other colleagues, I want to put on record my thanks to Sandra. She came in front of the committee and was absolutely fantastic—her passion for this area was there for all to see. We need to put that on the record. She has done a really good thing by bringing the issue into the public domain and giving us the impetus to take it further and to make life better for people.
I am not overly comfortable with closing the petition today, but I think that we need to get to that point; we probably just need to do a wee bit more work to get there, though.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. I was going to ask about the effect of a GRC, but you have already covered that in response to Jamie Greene.
You will obviously be aware that the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill passed through Parliament weeks before this situation came to light. I know that the bill has not become law because of the current situation with the UK Government. Nevertheless, did the process and passage of the bill have any impact on the decisions around the situation that has led us here today?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fulton MacGregor
Convener, I thought that we were doing it page by page; my mistake.
On “Under 18s/Secure care”, which is on page 12, I welcome the fact that the committee will be looking at that aspect of the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill. I expect that the rest of the bill will go to the Education, Children and Young People Committee.
However, I also want to say at this stage that I have had a meeting with the hope instead of handcuffs campaign. Other members may have been contacted by it as well. It does work on the way that young people are treated during their transportation to secure care. It might be worth thinking about that campaign for an evidence session, around the time of that bill. I know that we will talk about that at another stage, but I just wanted to raise that and to encourage members to meet the campaign group.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Fulton MacGregor
I thank the panel for those helpful answers.
You have referred a few times to the red lines of minimum core obligations. Can you—[Inaudible.]—duty bearers if those red lines are indeed crossed? Again, that is in the context of incorporation if the bill is passed.