The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 9 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Monica Lennon
It is an honour to speak as a Scottish Labour and Co-operative Party MSP for Glasgow. On behalf of my constituents in Glasgow and South Lanarkshire, which includes my home town of Blantyre, I will try my best to be an MSP who listens and works constructively with others to make their lives and futures brighter.
Although I am not new to the Parliament, I am acutely aware that nothing stays the same, so I return eager to learn from new and returning members and to work together to build a fairer, healthier, greener Scotland for current and future generations. That is why I am pleased to be speaking in Graham Simpson’s members’ business debate on AI data centres.
I will cut to the chase. I believe that we need an immediate pause on all large data centres, so that we can have the robust national strategy for hyperscale AI data centres that we are all asking for. As part of that, I want planning applications to be properly assessed locally. I do not want all decisions to be taken in centrally by ministers, but we need that national strategy and community voices to be at the heart of local decision making.
I am not against AI or digital technology, and I am not saying no to hyperscale data centres. However, I am arguing for a responsible strategic framework that enables evidence-based assessments that are rooted in the precautionary principle, which we do not have right now.
Ad hoc decision making without proper national guidance will be a disaster for our public health, nature, infrastructure and climate commitments. I say that because, for many years, I was a planning professional, so I am no stranger to contentious planning proposals or the need to balance competing interests. It is because of my experience and the expertise that I have gained through working with local authorities, the Scottish Government, developers, investors and communities that I urge ministers to pause and to give planning authorities, communities and developers the clarity and confidence that they deserve.
The concerns have not been raised only by politicians. I ask ministers to look at the detailed proposals for a moratorium that have been set out by Stop Climate Chaos Scotland, and to listen to Friends of the Earth Scotland, Action to Protect Rural Scotland and many others. Campaigners and communities are right to demand a proper assessment of the enormous energy, water and material demand of these projects and, importantly, their cumulative impact on land, climate targets, electricity grids and much more.
Communities are making their voices heard directly by us because they feel that the system is moving faster than the evidence should allow it to, and faster than their ability to have their concerns properly considered. We should listen to them. A pause will allow for good planning.
To have good planning, we also require our planning authorities to be properly resourced. We need expert planners and other specialists with the capacity to properly assess those applications. Those are precisely the kind of green jobs that we need in our communities.
I know that everyone has gone over time so I will try not to. This is not about saying no to technology; it is about saying yes to good planning, protecting our health and evidence, which I hope still really matters to colleagues. It is about saying yes to community voices, local democracy, protecting our climate and nature and unionised good work. Others have made good points tonight about fair work. We must ensure that our energy, land and infrastructure work in the interests of all the people of Scotland.
The proposals for data centres will not go away, so we will not lose anything by taking a little bit of time to get things right. We should not allow the rush towards big tech to determine our future by default.
I will continue engaging with colleagues. I really hope that ministers will listen but that they will act quickly, because our planning authorities and communities need assistance now. That is not about being against development but about having the right development in the right places.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2026
Monica Lennon
Will the minister take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2026
Monica Lennon
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I would have voted yes.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2026
Monica Lennon
On a point of order, Presiding Officer—anything to get on the record. [Laughter.] I would have voted no.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2026
Monica Lennon
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I would have abstained.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2026
Monica Lennon
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I would have voted yes.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2026
Monica Lennon
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I would have voted yes.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2026
Monica Lennon
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I would have voted yes.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 September 2026
Monica Lennon
I, Monica Lennon, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, his heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.