The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1884 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Sticking with this part of the bill, we have had questions about lotting and the transfer test. Is there anything that you want to bring to our attention today in relation to international examples or examples of good practice elsewhere of what the regulatory mechanisms could look like? You do not have to answer that, but if you want to add anything, this is the time to do so.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you. The committee has a good relationship with parliamentarians in Iceland. A few of us are just back from a trip there, so we might want to ask some questions of colleagues there.
Josh Doble asked whether Gresham House had come back to the committee with an answer on the number of jobs. I found the letter from April, in which Gresham House came back to the committee in response to my question. I will not read it all out, because it is a public document now, but the letter confirmed that Gresham House has contributed to the creation of around 200 jobs. There is a long-winded explanation on the issue of ownership, but the letter says that Gresham House indirectly owns around 298 hectares of forestry assets in Scotland.
This question is not directly about the bill, but how does that level of job creation compare with what we see with community-owned land or smaller landholdings? Does Josh Doble want to say anything on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you. That was helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you, convener, and good morning. We know that land and land use are Scotland’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases, so do the owners of large landholdings have a responsibility to promote net zero and climate change measures? Should there be obligations on the biggest emitters to reduce their emissions? I put that to all the witnesses, but I will come to Jon Hollingdale first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I put my question to Jon Hollingdale.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
It is helpful to get that on the record.
I want to focus on biodiversity, for a moment. Does the panel have a view on whether sustaining biodiversity is a sufficient requirement, or should the bill require the land management plan to set out how the land is being used to increase biodiversity? Linda Gillespie is definitely looking away, so I am looking again at Josh Doble.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I will press you a little further on that. Do you have a view on how specific the land management plan should be? I know that we do not want to give a long list of particular problems, but I am thinking about management in respect of deer or rhododendron, for example, which were mentioned in a debate in Parliament last week. Is that the kind of detail that you think would be required for the plans to be effective?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you for that.
You made a point about language that could be in the bill. I take your point about the phrase “large land holdings”. Do you want to expand on what you mean when you talk about “significant landholdings”? In the committee, we think about the meaning of words and their definitions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I see that Linda Gillespie does not wish to comment. That is fine.
I will move on to land management plans. The plans are required to set out how the land is being managed in a way that contributes to achieving net zero, adapting to climate change and increasing or sustaining biodiversity. Is that adequate, or are there other criteria that it might be appropriate to include? Should those be addressed through primary or secondary legislation?
Josh Doble is again maintaining eye contact, so we will go to him.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Scottish Labour will also support amendments 6, 11 and 12. The amendments align with our aims to increase parliamentary oversight, to improve transparency and, as Mark Ruskell mentioned, to get the extra detail that we felt was perhaps going to be lacking otherwise. We will therefore support the amendments.