The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3424 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Graham Simpson might pursue some of those lines of questioning, but over to you, Graham—you ask the questions that you want to ask.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Fiona Bennett might know. I do not know whether you can answer that question, Fiona.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
As we have no further questions, I thank very much for their input Christine McLaughlin and Fiona Bennett, who joined us remotely. I also thank Caroline Lamb for sharing with us her insights and knowledge about these areas on NHS governance. You said that you might come back to us with further detail on a few areas, which we would very much welcome.
I will now follow the earlier agreement that we reached and move the committee into private session.
12:15 Meeting continued in private until 12:36.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Is it not also about diversity and having some kind of blend?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
No, that was a pretty comprehensive starter. That was a really useful introduction. As I said, members of the committee will have more questions in each of those areas.
I want to ask you about the population-based planning approach. In the report, the Auditor General concludes:
“Scottish Government have yet to confirm how this population-based planning will operate.”
Where are we, then, with how that way of planning health services is being developed? What stage are you at with that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
To summarise your answer to that question, you still have yet to confirm how this will operate.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
How many people?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Item 2 is further consideration of the Auditor General for Scotland’s report “NHS in Scotland: Spotlight on governance”. I am very pleased to welcome our witnesses: Ian Bruce, the Ethical Standards Commissioner, and Melanie Stronach, the public appointments manager in the office of the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland.
I understand that Mr Bruce does not have an opening statement and would like us to go straight to questions. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
Are you a kind of gatekeeper for who gets through the sieving process and who is in the pool of people who can be sought to serve as board members of public bodies?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Richard Leonard
In relation to the system, if the sponsorship team or the director general in a civil service department is in charge of the public appointments process, and if one of the roles of the appointees is to challenge the sponsor division as well as the public body that they are appointed to, is there a danger that individuals who might be more challenging will not get through the process because the civil servants involved in that process will not want that?