The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3180 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
I will turn now to administrative data. The committee took evidence almost a year ago from Audit Scotland on the report at that time, which was in advance of the census being carried out. We then took evidence from National Records of Scotland in January of this year. We had exchanges with NRS about administrative data and how it would be used. We were told that it would not be used to fill data gaps, but we have learned since that, given the census return rates, administrative data will probably be used more heavily than was originally anticipated. What is the implication of that for the quality of census data?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
Anecdotally, one of the things that I picked up around the time of the census was that, for people who did not complete the census in one go, they discovered when they went to log back on that they had to start right from the beginning. I do not know whether that feature was common to the systems that were applied in Wales, Northern Ireland and England or whether it was a deficiency in the Scottish system that, perhaps, drove down the completion rate. I do not know whether you have picked that up.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay. The committee will need to consider whether we want to pursue that with NRS.
I invite Willie Coffey to put questions to the witnesses.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
We might need to follow up with you or NRS on elements that have arisen from the evidence that we have taken. Before I draw the public part of the meeting to a close, I thank our witnesses—Dharshi Santhakumaran, Graeme Samson and the Auditor General, Stephen Boyle—for their evidence.
10:10 Meeting continued in private until 11:24.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much for that helpful introduction to the report. I will begin by asking a factual question. The report talks about something called the census coverage survey. First of all, could you explain to us what that is?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
Do we know, at this stage, whether the next census will be in 10 years or nine years?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
I will steer away from politics, then, and ask my final question, at this stage.
You might recall that we had some quite detailed conversations with NRS about its access to administrative data. I think that it is the case that the Office for National Statistics has much more extensive access to HM Revenue and Customs data and Department for Work and Pensions data, for example. It has access to a much broader suite of data as a result of agreements that it had entered into. We were told that those are not data-sharing agreements that were entered into for the sole purpose of the census; they were entered into for other reasons. Nonetheless, it means that the ONS has wider access to much more comprehensive data than National Records of Scotland has.
My recollection is that when we quizzed National Records of Scotland, it said that it was looking to improve access to Scottish data sources in a range of work that it does, but is still at quite an early stage in that. The committee would be interested to learn—if you can help us with this—what progress has been made in respect of the data-sharing agreements that were spoken about in January this year.
09:30Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
To be clear, are there or are there not more risks associated with relying on less primary data and more administrative data?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
You referred to this a few minutes ago. Do you have a view on the target of a 90 per cent return rate as set against the backdrop of there having been a 97 per cent return rate in the other parts of the UK? Does not that target lack ambition, when other parts of the UK managed, in a digital first census, to achieve return rates of 97 per cent 12 months earlier? Why was the ambition only to get a 90 per cent return rate?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
Richard Leonard
We are agreed on that, too. Thank you.