The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3264 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Dr Williams wants to come in on this question.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thank you. Again, we will return to some of those themes during the morning.
I will ask a final question about placing the observations in the Audit Scotland report in the context of how things are affected on the front line. Multidisciplinary teams were very much a theme in the 2018 contract. They were part of the new era that was being heralded at that time. However, when I read the Audit Scotland report that is under discussion at the committee this morning, it is quite scathing in that it says that
“the expansion of MDTs has been slower than planned”,
deadlines have not been met and there have been “implementation gaps”. Could you describe what that looks like on the front line of the provision of GP services across Scotland? I will begin with Dr Provan this time.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thank you. Dr Williams wants to come in—briefly, perhaps, because I need to move on to Mr Beattie’s questions. Over to you, Dr Williams.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you—that is really helpful. Again, I am sure that that will be picked up by other members of the committee. I now invite Colin Beattie to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
I now invite Stephanie Callaghan to continue with the theme of the patient experience and other aspects of the Audit Scotland report.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Stephanie, we are quite short of time. If you agree, we will move on and I will invite Graham Simpson to put questions to the panel.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you Stephanie; that is much appreciated. I turn to Colin Beattie, who has some questions to put to the witnesses.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
I have two final questions to put to you, director general. The first may have been answered, not so much in the cabinet secretary’s statement, but in the associated paperwork that accompanied his statement, which I think Mr Chapman alluded to, in part, earlier on. I look back to the evidence that we took from the Auditor General on 14 May, which is reflected in paragraph 42 of the report. He said to us that
“the Scottish Government still needs to clarify its plans for general practice and to set out the actions, timescales and cost to deliver that.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 14 May 2025; c 4.]
What he is asking for there is very clear. Do you plan to publish that information?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
In the fullness of time, you might perhaps be able to pause and reflect on the evidence session that we had with the BMA and the Royal College of General Practitioners before you came in, because they gave a rather different picture of the action that was needed.
I will ask you one final question, director general, which again relates to yesterday’s announcement. One of the things that was announced was the merger of National Services Scotland and NHS Education for Scotland. Mergers and reorganisations often deflect organisations from their core purpose. In the evidence session that we had before you came in and in this one that you have been involved in, it has emerged that both those institutions—both those parts of the delivery of services—are critical to meeting the aspirations and the ambitions of the 2018 contract. Do you not think that merging those organisations might deflect them from the things that we want them to get on with, including data collection and ensuring that GPs are properly and fully employed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed. You have covered many of the topics that we will pick up this morning, including IT, premises, funding and the delivery of support and services.
I will begin with something that is a bit more political and practical, perhaps, by going back to the First Minister’s programme for government statement. He spoke about the delivery of an extra 100,000 appointments in GP surgeries. What was your reaction to that?