The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3150 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 June 2023
Richard Leonard
Again, under the Scottish public finance manual, you are obliged to speak up if you think that something is not value for money, which you did. Do you not think that you blurred the lines a little bit in your role as an impartial civil servant in the justification that appears in your letter to Neil Gray, which we have seen, around Government policy objectives and ministerial decisions? You stray into the policy territory. Why did you feel that it was necessary to do that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much. We now move to another area that has been highlighted in the report and which Willie Coffey has some questions on.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
Okay.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
Okay; thank you.
Obviously, the committee will have to consider whether it would be useful for us to invite officials from DG net zero to give evidence to us. If we decided to do that, we could put to them directly some of the questions that have arisen from our session with you.
I thank the Auditor General very much for the evidence that he has led this morning, and I thank Rebecca Seidel and Sally Thompson for the very useful evidence that they have contributed.
For the record, I should have mentioned at the start that Colin Beattie has submitted his apologies for not being at today’s meeting. I wanted to have that recorded.
I close the public part of the meeting and move us into private session.
10:08 Meeting continued in private until 11:03.Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
The principal item on this morning’s agenda is for us to consider an important report, which the Auditor General published in April. The report relates to audit work that was conducted up until March, so it is very up to date in both data and analysis, and looks into how the Scottish Government is set to deliver climate change goals.
I welcome our witnesses. Stephen Boyle is the Auditor General for Scotland. Alongside him are Rebecca Seidel and Sally Thompson, both of whom are senior managers at Audit Scotland.
As usual, we have quite a wide range of questions to put to you, but before we get into them, I ask the Auditor General to give us an opening statement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
Okay. Obviously, part of our role as a parliamentary committee with an interest in this area is to hold Government to account and it might be that we will consider taking up what you have just told us.
Another thing struck me in relation to the point about transparency. Does the GCE programme board publish minutes, for example? Does it have minutes? If so, are they in the public domain?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
Sometimes we as a committee consider elements of public life that are almost unique—for example, the national health service—but every Government in the northern and southern hemispheres has to face up to the global climate emergency.
To reiterate what I said at the start, your report came out last month, and is based on audit work that was carried out up until March of this year. In the report you say:
“The Scottish Government does not routinely carry out carbon assessments or capture the impact of spending decisions on its carbon footprint in the long term.”
Is that because it does not have a template to use? Presumably, other Governments are grappling with those kinds of measures and impact assessments and so on. Is there any good reason, learning from international experience, why those things could not be brought in and become an integral part of decision making in the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
I guess that my horizons are a bit wider than the UK. For example, what are the Scandinavian Governments doing? What is happening in Germany or some of the African states? There is no point in every single Government in every single country carrying out its own from-the-start approach. Presumably, shared understandings of policy implications and how you can better measure the impact of the decisions that you are taking on your climate change targets should exist.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
I bring Willie Coffey back in. He has a point to put.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 18 May 2023
Richard Leonard
However, are some of these things not pretty basic requirements? I am looking to you, Auditor General. It seems to me that the report points out that details of planned actions are
“vague and do not include intended completion dates”.
Neither is there any estimate of “expected impact.” That is pretty rudimentary, is it not, if you are carrying out a programme of work that is designed to bring about transformative change?