Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3123 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

One of the areas where we suggested that there could be a revision is the public recording of decisions. In this case, the CMAL board was overridden by a shareholder authorisation that has an equivalence with a written authority. I wonder whether you could respond—in writing, not right now—with the Government’s position on the public recording of instances of shareholder authorisation being required.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

Thank you. We have run over our time slightly. I suspect that we could go on much longer, minister, but the committee has another evidence session this morning.

I thank all of you—Fiona Hyslop, Colin Cook, Alison Irvine and Chris Wilcock—for your time and input this morning. There might be things that we want to follow up with you in writing, but I thank you for your openness in answering the questions that we have been putting to you.

I suspend the meeting to allow for a change of witnesses.

10:30 Meeting suspended.  

10:36 On resuming—  

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

Welcome back to the second session of this morning’s evidence taking by the Public Audit Committee, which will consider the section 22 report by the Auditor General for Scotland on the audit of Scottish Canals.

I welcome our witnesses, who include representatives from Transport Scotland—that is, the Government—and Scottish Canals. From Scottish Canals, we have John Paterson, chief executive; Maureen Campbell, chair of the board; Sarah Jane Hannah, director of finance and business services; and Richard Millar, chief operating officer. From Transport Scotland, we have Alison Irvine, interim chief executive—good morning, Alison; Kerry Twyman, director of finance and corporate services; and Gary Cox, interim director, aviation, maritime, freight and canals.

We have some questions to put to you about the report but, before we do that, I invite Mr Paterson to make a short opening statement.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

You mentioned the former First Minister’s evidence to us. She told us that

“no formal decisions were taken by Cabinet on these matters.”

Was the decision to nationalise the yard, for example, not a Cabinet-level decision?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

I will quote back to you what the Auditor General’s report says. Paragraph 15 includes expressions such as

“could not be supported by evidence”,

“lack of data”, “potential errors”, “There were errors”, “a lack of documentation”, “several errors” and so on. The report contains quite a catalogue of criticisms of your methodology, all of which has led to a decision not to issue approval of your accounts. As I mentioned earlier, that was described by the Auditor General as “a serious matter”.

From my point of view, I do not want us to be here again in a year’s time, and I am sure that you do not want that, either, but it feels as though we are hearing the same arguments that we heard a year ago. I think that we need persuading that things are moving forward.

Graham Simpson wants to come in.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

Yes—if it is a short one.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

These things we shall return to. Graham Simpson has some questions.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

That would be helpful, but it sounds a bit like you are saying that you would do the same again.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

For the record, there were serious concerns about the performance of the turnaround director, who was a part of the post-nationalisation project.

Again, my understanding of the demarcation here is that Neil Gray is the cabinet secretary who is responsible for the yard.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Richard Leonard

Let me move on, because time is running away with us already. What is the Scottish Government’s response—because we did not get this from the previous Minister for Transport—to our conclusion that

“There has been a significant lack of transparency and accountability throughout the project”?

We drew attention in particular to the fact that

“FMEL was not open about its inability to provide a full builder’s refund guarantee”.

We also think that, for example, it was “inappropriate”, during the course of a live procurement process, for the then transport minister to respond to a regional list MSP—that is a correction that we need to make to the report—that there had been occasions previously when a full builders refund guarantee had not been necessary. That was then taken as the green light by Jim McColl and the FMEL leadership to continue with their bid in the tendering process.

09:15