The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3123 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
On the point that, of the
“45 projects, the costs of eight had increased, 13 had been delayed and a further three had been paused”,
that means, does it not, that fewer than half are on track in terms of cost and timescale?
We hear what you said about it not being possible to be too precise about cost and delivery dates. However, I presume that people build in a degree of flexibility, with an indicative date of completion for an infrastructure project. You might make allowances for snagging and so on as part of the process. We are talking about a substantial number of infrastructure projects that have problems associated with them.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thanks. That is helpful. Does Graham Simpson want to come in on that point?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
Just going back to the equality and fairer Scotland duty, I am looking at the Government’s statement, which was authorised in March 2021, so it has been in place for more than two years. When I read the statement, I wondered how those assessments will be made. It says that plans will have to be
“fully Equality & Fairer Scotland Impact Assessed”.
How is the Government doing that? Have you seen any evidence that it has been doing it at all?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
Our main item this morning is agenda item 2, which is consideration of the Auditor General for Scotland’s briefing paper, “Investing in Scotland’s infrastructure”, which was published at the end of September. I am pleased to welcome the Auditor General, Stephen Boyle, who is joined by Ashleigh Madjitey and Dharshi Santhakumaran, from Audit Scotland. Ashleigh is an audit manager and Dharshi is a senior audit manager.
Before we get into the questions, I ask the Auditor General to make a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
So those are not projects with work under way on the ground or on which construction has commenced. They are in a pipeline, and that will include sign-off of the business case.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
I know that Willie Coffey also wants to come in on this point. I note that the briefing paper talks about the Scottish Futures Trust’s role in advising the Government in advance of difficult decisions on the prioritisation of projects. Its advice, therefore, is not just on the contractual terms that might be negotiated around a PFI, public-private partnership or whatever arrangement coming to an end; it also offers the Government an advisory role in establishing what is called in paragraph 10 of the briefing “a prioritisation framework”. Can you elaborate on that? We have talked about prioritisation being necessary, funding being challenging and difficult decisions having to be made, but do we know how the Government will make those decisions? Have we seen that framework, for example?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
Can you clarify that, in all cases, the consideration is absorption into the public sector, and that the Scottish Futures Trust is not advising the Government on other options such as extending the PFI deal or bringing in a different contractor. I realise that a lot of the contracts were build as well as operate, but I wonder whether that is also a consideration.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
My final question perhaps picks up some of that. In the briefing paper, you state:
“Strong leadership is needed ... to deliver the reform ambitions.”
That certainly echoes what the committee in session 5 felt was a recurring theme: the absence of strong leadership, or perhaps the importance of strong leadership in driving through some of these improvements and reforms. What is your sense of where we are with that? Have you seen much evidence of that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
That is very helpful. You are raising questions that we probably need to put directly to the Government. I have a quick question before I bring Willie Coffey then Graham Simpson back in. You have mentioned a couple of times the national treatment centres and the role that it was hoped they would fulfil. However, it is recorded in the report that the cost of the programme has more than doubled, while the delivery of the programme is at least three years late and counting. Does that suggest that the national treatment centre programme will be, or needs to be, scaled back?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2023
Richard Leonard
That is a very fair point. Willie Coffey wants to come in on revenue-financed projects.